Neurology · 2020
Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic postconditioning after thrombolysis in patients with stroke.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
An Jia-Qi, Cheng Ya-Wen, Guo Yi-Chen, Wei Meng, Gong Min-Jie, Tang Yong-Lan, Yuan Xing-Yun, Song Wen-Feng, Mu Chun-Ying, Zhang Ai-Feng, Saguner Ardan M, Li Guo-Liang, Luo Guo-Gang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPC) on patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing IV thrombolysis (IVT).
METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial was performed with patients with AIS receiving IVT. Patients in the RIPC group were administered RIPC treatment (after IVT) during hospitalization. The primary endpoint was a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at day 90. The safety, tolerability, and neuroprotection biomarkers associated with RIPC were also evaluated.
RESULTS: We collected data from both the RIPC group (n = 34) and the control group (n = 34). The average duration of hospitalization was 11.2 days. There was no significant difference between 2 groups at admission for the NIH Stroke Scale score (p = 0.364) or occur-to-treatment time (p = 0.889). Favorable recovery (mRS score 0-1) at 3 months was obtained in 71.9% of patients in the RIPC group vs 50.0% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 9.85, 95% confidence interval 1.54-63.16; p = 0.016). We further found significantly lower plasma S100-β (p = 0.007) and higher vascular endothelial growth factor (p = 0.003) levels in the RIPC group than in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeated RIPC combined with IVT can significantly facilitate recovery of nerve function and improve clinical prognosis of patients with AIS.
CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03218293.
CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that RIPC after tissue plasminogen activator treatment of AIS significantly increases the proportion of patients with an MRS score of 0 or 1 at 90 days.
METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial was performed with patients with AIS receiving IVT. Patients in the RIPC group were administered RIPC treatment (after IVT) during hospitalization. The primary endpoint was a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at day 90. The safety, tolerability, and neuroprotection biomarkers associated with RIPC were also evaluated.
RESULTS: We collected data from both the RIPC group (n = 34) and the control group (n = 34). The average duration of hospitalization was 11.2 days. There was no significant difference between 2 groups at admission for the NIH Stroke Scale score (p = 0.364) or occur-to-treatment time (p = 0.889). Favorable recovery (mRS score 0-1) at 3 months was obtained in 71.9% of patients in the RIPC group vs 50.0% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 9.85, 95% confidence interval 1.54-63.16; p = 0.016). We further found significantly lower plasma S100-β (p = 0.007) and higher vascular endothelial growth factor (p = 0.003) levels in the RIPC group than in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeated RIPC combined with IVT can significantly facilitate recovery of nerve function and improve clinical prognosis of patients with AIS.
CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03218293.
CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that RIPC after tissue plasminogen activator treatment of AIS significantly increases the proportion of patients with an MRS score of 0 or 1 at 90 days.