American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2005
Detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence [corrected] following midurethral versus bladder sling procedures.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Botros Sylvia M, Abramov Yoram, Goldberg Roger P, Beaumont Jennifer L, Gandhi Sanjay, Miller Jay-James R, Sand Peter K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence rates after midurethral slings versus bladder neck slings.
STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred forty subjects underwent midurethral slings or bladder neck slings. Comparisons were made using Student's t test and chi2 test. Multivariate analysis was performed to detect confounding factors.
RESULTS: More patients in the midurethral sling group resolved detrusor overactivity than in the bladder neck sling group (38% versus 15%, P < .001). In addition, subjects in the midurethral sling group had significantly lower rates of de novo detrusor overactivity than subjects in the bladder neck sling group (29% versus 62%, P = .002). The only significant predictors of postoperative detrusor overactivity were preoperative detrusor overactivity (P < .001) and sling type (P < .001). After adjusting for preoperative detrusor overactivity, bladder neck slings significantly increased the risk for persistent detrusor overactivity (odds ratio 3.9).
CONCLUSION: Midurethral slings have increased rates of resolution of detrusor overactivity and lower rates of de novo detrusor overactivity than transvaginal bladder neck sling procedures.
STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred forty subjects underwent midurethral slings or bladder neck slings. Comparisons were made using Student's t test and chi2 test. Multivariate analysis was performed to detect confounding factors.
RESULTS: More patients in the midurethral sling group resolved detrusor overactivity than in the bladder neck sling group (38% versus 15%, P < .001). In addition, subjects in the midurethral sling group had significantly lower rates of de novo detrusor overactivity than subjects in the bladder neck sling group (29% versus 62%, P = .002). The only significant predictors of postoperative detrusor overactivity were preoperative detrusor overactivity (P < .001) and sling type (P < .001). After adjusting for preoperative detrusor overactivity, bladder neck slings significantly increased the risk for persistent detrusor overactivity (odds ratio 3.9).
CONCLUSION: Midurethral slings have increased rates of resolution of detrusor overactivity and lower rates of de novo detrusor overactivity than transvaginal bladder neck sling procedures.