MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.021

Медицинская библиотека · Waste management (New York, N.Y.) · 2015

Assessment of co-composting of sludge and woodchips in the perspective of environmental impacts (EASETECH).

Zhao Yan, Lu Wenjing, Damgaard Anders, Zhang Yu, Wang Hongtao

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To reveal potential impacts to environment and human health quantitatively, co-composting and utilization of sludge and woodchips were investigated using a life-cycle-based model, EASETECH. Three scenarios were assessed through experiments using different material ratios. Emission amounts during co-composting were determined by monitoring data and mass balance. With 100t sludge treatment, co-composting showed impacts to acidification (29.9 PE) and terrestrial eutrophication (57.7 PE) mainly for ammonia emission. Compost utilization presented savings on freshwater eutrophication (-1.5 PE) because of phosphorus substitution. With the application of fewer woodchips, impacts to acidification and terrestrial eutrophication decreased because more ammonium was reserved rather than released. All impacts to human toxicity were not significant (8.2±0.6 PE) because the compost was used for urban landscaping rather than farming. Trace gaseous compounds showed marginal impacts to global warming and toxicity categories. The results provide a new perspective and offer evidence for appropriate sludge treatment selection.

Для цитирования: Zhao Yan, Lu Wenjing, Damgaard Anders, Zhang Yu, Wang Hongtao. Assessment of co-composting of sludge and woodchips in the perspective of environmental impacts (EASETECH).. Waste management (New York, N.Y.). 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.