MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0970-4388.95581

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry · 2012

Nature of feeding practices among children with cleft lip and palate.

Goyal A, Jena A K, Kaur M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To find out the nature of feeding practices among children with cleft lip and palate.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 155 subjects of less than 2 years of age with cleft lip and palate were chosen and divided into three groups according to their chronological age. Group I included 47 subjects (M=35, F=12) who were <6 months old, Group II included 56 subjects (M=36, F=20) aged between 6 months and 1 year, and Group III included 52 subjects (M=28, F=24) of age between 1 and 2 years. Both the parents of the subjects with cleft lip and palate were interviewed and the details of the existing feeding practice were recorded on a standard pro forma. Chi-square test was applied to find out any significant difference in the feeding method between males and females.

RESULTS

Spoon feeding was found as the most common feeding practice method. Breast feeding was the second most common feeding practice method among Group I subjects, whereas bottle feeding was the second most common feeding practice method among Group II and III subjects. The difference in the feeding practice between male and female subjects in all the three groups was very negligible and statistically not significant.

CONCLUSION

Spoon feeding was found as the most common feeding method practiced by the parents of children with cleft lip and palate.

Для цитирования: Goyal A, Jena A K, Kaur M. Nature of feeding practices among children with cleft lip and palate.. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2012. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.95581.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.