Healing of traumatic diaphragm injuries: comparison of laparoscopic versus open techniques in an animal model.

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgical techniques have become routinely applied to the evaluation and treatment of patients with isolated diaphragmatic injuries due to penetrating trauma. The objective of the study was to compare the healing of diaphragm injuries as determined by macroscopic inspection, histologic appearance, and tensile strength following repair by open suturing, laparoscopic suturing, and laparoscopic stapling techniques in an animal model.

METHODS

Using a pig model, three injuries were created and repaired in each hemidiaphragm of five animals, for a total of 30 lacerations. These injuries were repaired using single-layer open repair, single-layer laparoscopic repair, or laparoscopic stapling. After a 6-week healing period the animals were sacrificed. The gross integrity, histologic appearance using H+E and trichrome satins, and tensile strength of each repair were assessed.

RESULTS

All injuries were grossly intact without dehiscence or herniation. Histologic examination revealed no difference in the collagen deposition between the three groups. The tensile strengths of each type of repair were similar.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic techniques used to repair diaphragmatic injuries allow for adequate healing equivalent to open sutured repairs. Simple approximation of the peritoneum with laparoscopic staples allows full-thickness healing of these injuries.