MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.006

Медицинская библиотека · Arab journal of urology · 2017

Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility.

Etafy Mohamed, Gudeloglu Ahmet, Brahmbhatt Jamin V, Parekattil Sijo J

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To present the current state of the art in various robot-assisted microsurgical procedures in male infertility and review the latest literature, as the technology in infertility procedures has substantially developed since the incorporation of the Vinci® robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The search strategy in this review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A search strategy was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane electronic databases (from 2000 to present) to identify studies that included both robotic and male infertility.

RESULTS

In all, 23 studies were found, 12 of which met our inclusion criteria. Articles were excluded if the study did not include both male infertility and robotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic assistance for microsurgical procedures in male infertility appears to be safe and feasible. It has several advantages including elimination of tremor, multi-view magnification, additional instrument arms, and enhanced dexterity with articulating instrument arms. It also has a short learning curve with a small skin incision. However, larger, prospective studies are needed to establish the clinical benefits over standard microsurgery.

Для цитирования: Etafy Mohamed, Gudeloglu Ahmet, Brahmbhatt Jamin V, Parekattil Sijo J. Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility.. Arab journal of urology. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.006.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.