MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.12.019

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2006

The utility of bipolar electrocautery in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

Ghaheri Bobak A, Fong Karen J, Hwang Peter H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The surgical treatment of epistaxis associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is varied. Laser therapy is often inadequate for larger complex lesions. This study sought to determine if bipolar cautery can be effectively and safely used in treating HHT-associated epistaxis.

STUDY DESIGN AND

SETTING

Records from all patients with HHT treated surgically over 8 years were reviewed retrospectively. Outcomes or complications were noted in the clinic on follow-up evaluation.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with HHT who underwent surgical treatment of epistaxis were evaluated; 18 were treated with bipolar cautery. Forty-two separate bipolar treatments were performed. No new septal perforations or synechiae were noted. Twenty-two of 42 treatments were coupled with ancillary laser treatments. The bipolar was also used as the sole technique in 20 procedures.

CONCLUSION

Bipolar electrocautery is a safe and effective tool for the intraoperative control of HHT-related epistaxis.

SIGNIFICANCE: Bipolar electrocautery may be used as an adjunct to laser techniques or as a stand-alone technique.

EBM RATING: C-4.

Для цитирования: Ghaheri Bobak A, Fong Karen J, Hwang Peter H. The utility of bipolar electrocautery in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.12.019.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.