Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2024
The Pathways to Community Living Initiative (PCLI) for older adults: implementation and outcomes.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kellett Rowena, Findlay Lillian, Lubbe Sean, Wand Anne Pf
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To describe implementation of the Pathways to Community Living Initiative (PCLI) within an Older People's Mental Health (OPMH) service.
METHOD: A retrospective observational study was conducted. Implementation comprised partnership with a specialist Residential Aged Care Facility (RACF). Data were obtained from Clinical Advisory Committee (CAC) discussion and minutes, the PCLI database, and consumer medical records.
RESULTS: Eighteen consumers were accepted onto the program between April 2019 and March 2023. Their PCLI and rating scale outcomes alongside interventions facilitating placements are described. Interventions included OPMH case management, wide-reaching liaison, and inservices. Challenges included communication, confusion regarding roles, and differing views on capacity to accommodate complex consumers. Solutions included streamlining communication, including clinical updates in the CAC, facility appointment of a lead PCLI-nurse, and targeted RACF education.
CONCLUSIONS: Considered interventions strengthened the OPMH and specialist RACF partnership over time. Clarification of professional roles and intersection with other services was crucial. Successful placement for PCLI consumers required consideration of personalised needs and existing resident mix, liaison with stakeholders, and targeted staff training. These strategies may apply to other health services implementing similar initiatives supporting community placements for OPMH consumers with complex needs.
METHOD: A retrospective observational study was conducted. Implementation comprised partnership with a specialist Residential Aged Care Facility (RACF). Data were obtained from Clinical Advisory Committee (CAC) discussion and minutes, the PCLI database, and consumer medical records.
RESULTS: Eighteen consumers were accepted onto the program between April 2019 and March 2023. Their PCLI and rating scale outcomes alongside interventions facilitating placements are described. Interventions included OPMH case management, wide-reaching liaison, and inservices. Challenges included communication, confusion regarding roles, and differing views on capacity to accommodate complex consumers. Solutions included streamlining communication, including clinical updates in the CAC, facility appointment of a lead PCLI-nurse, and targeted RACF education.
CONCLUSIONS: Considered interventions strengthened the OPMH and specialist RACF partnership over time. Clarification of professional roles and intersection with other services was crucial. Successful placement for PCLI consumers required consideration of personalised needs and existing resident mix, liaison with stakeholders, and targeted staff training. These strategies may apply to other health services implementing similar initiatives supporting community placements for OPMH consumers with complex needs.