Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in the treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

BACKGROUND

Given the evolving application and promising outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in various thromboembolic conditions, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs with warfarin in the post-acute treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) using clinical and radiological parameters.

METHODS

A total of 140 CVST patients were enrolled, with 95 receiving warfarin and 45 receiving DOACs as post-acute treatment. Clinical and imaging parameters of the patients in follow-up visits were investigated, including the last modified Rankin Scale (mRS), venous thromboembolic events, CVST recurrence, mortality rate, recanalization status, and hemorrhagic events, to compare the efficacy and safety of treatment between the two groups.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients' assessments using two prognostic scores, ISCVT-RS and IN-REvASC, revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of prognostic risk categories between the warfarin and DOACs groups. Following acute therapy, patients in the warfarin and DOACs groups were followed up for the median of 359 and 325 days, respectively. Analysis to compare the efficacy of warfarin and DOACs revealed no significant difference in last mRS scores, CVST recurrence rate, venous thromboembolic events, and recanalization status between the two groups. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of hemorrhagic events between warfarin and DOACs groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that DOACs have comparable safety and efficacy in the post-acute treatment of CVST patients; however, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to validate our findings.