MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1077558716654631

Медицинская библиотека · Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2016

Patient Mobility for Elective Secondary Health Care Services in Response to Patient Choice Policies: A Systematic Review.

Aggarwal Ajay, Lewis Daniel, Mason Malcolm, Sullivan Richard, van der Meulen Jan

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Our review establishes the empirical evidence for patient mobility for elective secondary care services in countries that allow patients to choose their health care provider. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles between 1990 and 2015. Of 5,994 titles/abstracts reviewed, 26 studies were included. The studies used three main methodological models to establish mobility. Variation in the extent of patient mobility was observed across the studies. Mobility was positively associated with lower waiting times, indicators of better service quality, and access to advanced technology. It was negatively associated with advanced age or lower socioeconomic backgrounds. From a policy perspective we demonstrate that a significant proportion of patients are prepared to travel beyond their nearest provider for elective services. As a consequence, some providers are likely to be "winners" and others "losers," which could result in overall decreased provider capacity or inefficient utilization of existing services. Equity also remains a key concern.

Для цитирования: Aggarwal Ajay, Lewis Daniel, Mason Malcolm, Sullivan Richard, van der Meulen Jan. Patient Mobility for Elective Secondary Health Care Services in Response to Patient Choice Policies: A Systematic Review.. Medical care research and review : MCRR. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1077558716654631.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.