Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2015
The five-minute prebreathe in evaluating carbon dioxide absorption in a closed-circuit rebreather: a randomized single-blind study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deng Carolyn, Pollock Neal W, Gant Nicholas, Hannam Jacqueline A, Dooley Adam, Mesley Peter, Mitchell Simon J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Closed-circuit underwater rebreather apparatus (CCR) recycles expired gas through a carbon dioxide (CO₂) 'scrubber'. Prior to diving, users perform a five-minute 'prebreathe' during which they self-check for symptoms of hypercapnia that might indicate a failure in the scrubber. There is doubt that this strategy is valid.
METHODS: Thirty divers were block-randomized to breathe for five minutes on a circuit in two of the following three conditions: normal scrubber, partly-failed scrubber, and absent scrubber. Subjects were blind to trial allocation and instructed to terminate the prebreathe on suspicion of hypercapnia.
RESULTS: Early termination was seen in 0/20, 2/20, and 15/20 of the normal, partly-failed, and absent absorber conditions, respectively. Subjects in the absent group experienced a steady, uncontrolled rise in inspired (PICO₂) and end-tidal CO₂ (PETCO₂). Seven subjects exhibited little or no increase in minute volume yet reported dyspnoea at termination, suggesting a biochemically-mediated stimulus to terminate. This was consistent with results in the partly-failed condition (which resulted in a plateaued mean PICO₂ near 20 mmHg), where a small increase in ventilation typically compensated for the inspired CO₂ increase. Consequently, mean PETCO₂ did not change and in the absence of a hypercapnic biochemical stimulus, subjects were very insensitive to this condition.
CONCLUSIONS: While prebreathes are useful to evaluate other primary functions, the five-minute prebreathe is insensitive for CO₂ scrubber faults in a rebreather. Partly-failed conditions are dangerous because most will not be detected at the surface, even though they may become very important at depth.
METHODS: Thirty divers were block-randomized to breathe for five minutes on a circuit in two of the following three conditions: normal scrubber, partly-failed scrubber, and absent scrubber. Subjects were blind to trial allocation and instructed to terminate the prebreathe on suspicion of hypercapnia.
RESULTS: Early termination was seen in 0/20, 2/20, and 15/20 of the normal, partly-failed, and absent absorber conditions, respectively. Subjects in the absent group experienced a steady, uncontrolled rise in inspired (PICO₂) and end-tidal CO₂ (PETCO₂). Seven subjects exhibited little or no increase in minute volume yet reported dyspnoea at termination, suggesting a biochemically-mediated stimulus to terminate. This was consistent with results in the partly-failed condition (which resulted in a plateaued mean PICO₂ near 20 mmHg), where a small increase in ventilation typically compensated for the inspired CO₂ increase. Consequently, mean PETCO₂ did not change and in the absence of a hypercapnic biochemical stimulus, subjects were very insensitive to this condition.
CONCLUSIONS: While prebreathes are useful to evaluate other primary functions, the five-minute prebreathe is insensitive for CO₂ scrubber faults in a rebreather. Partly-failed conditions are dangerous because most will not be detected at the surface, even though they may become very important at depth.