MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00134-003-2037-z

Медицинская библиотека · Intensive care medicine · 2003

Validation of the multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) score in critically ill medical and surgical patients.

Buckley Thomas A, Gomersall Charles D, Ramsay Sarah J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) score externally.

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Mixed medical/surgical ICU in a tertiary referral university hospital.

PATIENTS AND

PARTICIPANTS

Thousand eight hundred and nine patients admitted to ICU for more than 24 h over a 3-year period.

INTERVENTIONS: None.

MEASUREMENTS AND

RESULTS

The MOD score was calculated daily for all patients. The criterion validity of the individual organ scores, the maximal MOD score and the change in MOD score were assessed by examining the relationship between increasing scores and ICU mortality. Increased maximal MOD scores and each of the six individual organ scores, and change in MOD scores were associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximal and individual organ scores have criterion validity when tested in a different ICU from that in which the scores were derived, indicating that the scoring systems are reproducible. The association of change in MOD score with mortality indicates that the score is responsive. These data, combined with previous data establishing concept and content validity, indicate that the MOD score is a valid measure of multi-organ dysfunction.

Для цитирования: Buckley Thomas A, Gomersall Charles D, Ramsay Sarah J. Validation of the multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) score in critically ill medical and surgical patients.. Intensive care medicine. 2003. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-2037-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.