MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ctcp.2013.10.003

Медицинская библиотека · Complementary therapies in clinical practice · 2013

Complementary therapy provision in a London community clinic for people living with HIV/AIDS: a case study.

Lorenc Ava, Banarsee Reetoo, Robinson Nicola

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To present a case study of complementary therapy (CT) provision within a community HIV multi-agency service in a Northwest London deprived area.

METHODS

Anonymised routine service data were provided for all clients (n = 1030) August 2010 to October 2012. Face-to-face meetings provided feedback from volunteers (9 CT-using clients and 9 staff).

RESULTS

CT-users were demographically similar to other clients. Support for coping with HIV was commonly cited as a service benefit. Over 26 months 1416 CT sessions were provided; 875 aromatherapy and 471 shiatsu. CT-users' most common concerns were pain (48%), stress (15%) and insomnia (13%), few had heard of or used CT before. Perceived mental and emotional benefits included relaxation,stress relief, relieving musculoskeletal aches and pains. Service challenges included time and funding, though staff felt CT may be cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

CT may provide important support and treatment options for HIV disease, but cost effectiveness requires further evaluation.

Для цитирования: Lorenc Ava, Banarsee Reetoo, Robinson Nicola. Complementary therapy provision in a London community clinic for people living with HIV/AIDS: a case study.. Complementary therapies in clinical practice. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2013.10.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.