MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1089/vbz.2010.0244

Медицинская библиотека · Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2011

West Nile virus monitoring in migrating and resident water birds in Iran: are common coots the main reservoirs of the virus in wetlands?

Fereidouni Sasan R, Ziegler Ute, Linke Sonja, Niedrig Matthias, Modirrousta Hossein, Hoffmann Bernd, Groschup Martin H

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A molecular and serological study was carried out to determine the West Nile virus (WNV) status in different species of wild water birds. From 2003 to 2007, samples were collected from 519 birds representing 26 different species in Iran. Out of 519 serum samples tested for WNV antibodies, 78 (15%) were positive when tested using virus neutralization and immunofluorescence. Antibodies of WNV were detected in 71 out of 131 common coot (Fulica atra) samples. In comparison, only 7 out of 388 birds that were belonged to 25 other species of water birds revealed positive results. For most Anatidae species, no positive duck in serological tests was found. Further, no WNV viral RNA-positive samples were found in this study. Results of this investigation provide important information about the prevalence of WNV in wild water birds in Iran and indicate the potential role and importance of common coots in ecology of WNVs.

Для цитирования: Fereidouni Sasan R, Ziegler Ute, Linke Sonja, Niedrig Matthias, Modirrousta Hossein, Hoffmann Bernd, Groschup Martin H. West Nile virus monitoring in migrating and resident water birds in Iran: are common coots the main reservoirs of the virus in wetlands?. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.). 2011. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2010.0244.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.