European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021
Midodrine and albumin versus albumin alone for the secondary prophylaxis of acute kidney injury in a patient with cirrhosis and ascites.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sharma Praveen, Puri Pankaj, Bansal Naresh, Singla Vikas, Kumar Ashish, ShriHari Anil Anikhindi, Arora Anil
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in a patient with cirrhosis has high short-term mortality. Midodrine has shown promising results in the treatment of AKI-hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI).
AIMS: To compare midodrine and albumin versus albumin alone for the secondary prophylaxis of HRS-AKI.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: Open labeled, nonrandomized, pilot study. Patients with a diagnosis of HRS-AKI were recruited after complete recovery. Patients were given midodrine daily (15 mg) and injection albumin infusion 20 g weekly in group-A (Gp-A) and injection albumin 20 g weekly with no midodrine in group-B (Gp-B). The primary endpoint was the recurrence of AKI-HRS, and the secondary endpoint was ascites tap in 2-month period.
RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were enrolled in Gp-A, n = 22, and Gp-B, n = 20. There was no significant difference between the groups (Gp-A vs. Gp-B) in terms of age, model stage liver disease, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score and serum creatinine at inclusion (1.27 ± 0.1 vs. 1.22 ± 0.2 mg/dL). During follow up ten patients (50%) in Gp-B and four patients (18%) in Gp-A develop HRS-AKI (P = 0.04). The mean number of ascites tap was significantly higher in Gp-B compared to Gp-A (2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.5) in 2 months. There was a significant increase in mean arterial pressure in Gp-A compared to Gp-B on days 7, 15, 30, 45 and 60. There was a significant difference in mean arterial pressure at day 7 in patients who developed HRS-AKI versus those who did not develop HRS-AKI [(n = 14, 65.5 ± 5.5) vs. (n = 28,74.6 ± 9.2 mm Hg), P = 0.02].
CONCLUSIONS: Midodrine along with albumin infusion, is helpful in the secondary prophylaxis of HRS-AKI and reduces the number of ascites tap. However, a large randomized study is required for further validation.
AIMS: To compare midodrine and albumin versus albumin alone for the secondary prophylaxis of HRS-AKI.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: Open labeled, nonrandomized, pilot study. Patients with a diagnosis of HRS-AKI were recruited after complete recovery. Patients were given midodrine daily (15 mg) and injection albumin infusion 20 g weekly in group-A (Gp-A) and injection albumin 20 g weekly with no midodrine in group-B (Gp-B). The primary endpoint was the recurrence of AKI-HRS, and the secondary endpoint was ascites tap in 2-month period.
RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were enrolled in Gp-A, n = 22, and Gp-B, n = 20. There was no significant difference between the groups (Gp-A vs. Gp-B) in terms of age, model stage liver disease, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score and serum creatinine at inclusion (1.27 ± 0.1 vs. 1.22 ± 0.2 mg/dL). During follow up ten patients (50%) in Gp-B and four patients (18%) in Gp-A develop HRS-AKI (P = 0.04). The mean number of ascites tap was significantly higher in Gp-B compared to Gp-A (2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.5) in 2 months. There was a significant increase in mean arterial pressure in Gp-A compared to Gp-B on days 7, 15, 30, 45 and 60. There was a significant difference in mean arterial pressure at day 7 in patients who developed HRS-AKI versus those who did not develop HRS-AKI [(n = 14, 65.5 ± 5.5) vs. (n = 28,74.6 ± 9.2 mm Hg), P = 0.02].
CONCLUSIONS: Midodrine along with albumin infusion, is helpful in the secondary prophylaxis of HRS-AKI and reduces the number of ascites tap. However, a large randomized study is required for further validation.