DOI 10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0080.03072024
Comparative analysis prediction of prostate and testicular cancer mortality using machine learning: accuracy study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The mortality rates of prostate and testicular cancer are higher mortality in the northeast region.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to compare the efficacy of machine learning libraries in predicting testicular and prostate cancer mortality.
DESIGN AND
SETTING
A comparative analysis of the pyMannKendall and Prophet machine-learning algorithms was conducted to develop predictive models using data from DATASUS (TabNet) to Caicó (Brazil) and Rio Grande do Norte (Brazil).
METHODS
Data on prostate and testicular cancer mortality in men from 2000 to 2019 were collected. The prediction accuracy of the Prophet algorithm was evaluated using the mean squared error (MSE), the root mean squared error and analyzed using the pyMannKendall, and Prophet libraries.
RESULTS
The research data were made publicly available on GitHub. The machine test confirmed the accuracy of the predictions, with the root MSE (RMSE) values closely matching the observed data for Caicó (RMSE = 2.46) and Rio Grande do Norte (RMSE = 22.85). The Prophet algorithm predicted an increase in prostate cancer mortality by 2030 in Caicó and Rio Grande do Norte. This prediction was corroborated by the pyMannKendall analysis, which indicated a 99% probability of a rising mortality trend in Caicó (P < 0.01; tau = 0.586; intercept = 2.59) and Rio Grande do Norte (P = 2.06; tau = 0.84, and intercept = 119.63). For testicular cancer, no significant mortality trend was identified by Prophet or pyMann-Kendall.
CONCLUSIONS
Libraries are reliable tools for predicting mortality, providing support for strategic health planning, and implementing preventive measures to ensure men's health. Addressing the gender gap in DATASUS is essential.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.