The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2014
Use of a medically supervised injection facility among street youth.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hadland Scott E, DeBeck Kora, Kerr Thomas, Nguyen Paul, Simo Annick, Montaner Julio S, Wood Evan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Supervised injecting facilities (SIFs) provide a sanctioned space for injection drug users and are associated with decreased overdose mortality and HIV risk behaviors among adults. Little is known about SIF use among youth. We identified factors associated with use of the Vancouver SIF, the only such facility in North America, among street youth.
METHODS: From September 2005 to May 2012, we collected data from the At-Risk Youth Study, a prospective cohort of street youth in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Eligible youth were aged 14-26 years. Participants reporting injection completed questionnaires at baseline and semiannually. We used generalized estimating equation logistic regression to identify factors associated with SIF use.
RESULTS: During the study period, 42.3% of 414 injecting youth reported use of the SIF at least once. Of all SIF-using youth, 51.4% went to the facility at least weekly, and 44.5% used it for at least one-quarter of all injections. SIF-using youth were more likely to live or spend time in the neighborhood surrounding the SIF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.38-4.54), to inject in public (AOR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.53-2.84), or to engage in daily injection of heroin (AOR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.72-3.24), cocaine (AOR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.34-4.45), or crystal methamphetamine (AOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.13-2.31).
CONCLUSIONS: This study, the first to examine SIF use among street youth in North America, demonstrated that the facility attracted high-frequency young drug users most at risk of blood-borne infection and overdose and those who otherwise inject in public spaces.
METHODS: From September 2005 to May 2012, we collected data from the At-Risk Youth Study, a prospective cohort of street youth in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Eligible youth were aged 14-26 years. Participants reporting injection completed questionnaires at baseline and semiannually. We used generalized estimating equation logistic regression to identify factors associated with SIF use.
RESULTS: During the study period, 42.3% of 414 injecting youth reported use of the SIF at least once. Of all SIF-using youth, 51.4% went to the facility at least weekly, and 44.5% used it for at least one-quarter of all injections. SIF-using youth were more likely to live or spend time in the neighborhood surrounding the SIF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.38-4.54), to inject in public (AOR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.53-2.84), or to engage in daily injection of heroin (AOR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.72-3.24), cocaine (AOR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.34-4.45), or crystal methamphetamine (AOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.13-2.31).
CONCLUSIONS: This study, the first to examine SIF use among street youth in North America, demonstrated that the facility attracted high-frequency young drug users most at risk of blood-borne infection and overdose and those who otherwise inject in public spaces.