Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025
Predicting dose response to prostate cancer radiotherapy: validation of a radiation signature in the randomized phase III NRG/RTOG 0126 and SAKK 09/10 trials.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование III фазыРандомизированное исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dal Pra A, Ghadjar P, Ryu H M, Proudfoot J A, Hayoz S, Michalski J M, Spratt D E, Liu Y, Schär C, Berlin A M, Zwahlen D R, Simko J P, Hölscher T, Efstathiou J A, Polat B, Sandler H M, Hildebrandt G, Parliament M B, Mueller A-C, Dayes I S, Plasswilm L, Correa R J M, Robertson J M, Karrison T G, Davicioni E, Hall W A, Feng F Y, Pollack A, Thalmann G N, Nguyen P L, Aebersold D M, Tran P T, Zhao S G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The SAKK 09/10 trial randomized biochemically recurrent prostate cancer patients to salvage radiation 64 Gy versus 70 Gy, and the NRG/RTOG 0126 randomized intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients to definitive radiation 70.2 Gy versus 79.2 Gy. We investigated a previously developed Post-Operative Radiation Therapy Outcomes Score (PORTOS) to identify preferential benefit from radiation dose escalation (DE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PORTOS was evaluated in patients enrolled in SAKK 09/10 and NRG/RTOG 0126 with available tissue that passed quality control (n = 226, 215). PORTOS was evaluated in the published post-operative groups in SAKK 09/10 and in tertiles in NRG/RTOG 0126 as cut-offs had not been established for biopsy samples and definitive radiation patients. Clinical and molecular correlates in a real-world dataset of 42 407 prostatectomy and 31 107 biopsy samples were also analyzed.
RESULTS: In SAKK 09/10, the biomarker-treatment interaction was statistically significant between PORTOS (lower versus higher) and treatment arm for clinical progression-free survival. Only patients in the higher PORTOS group benefited from DE. In NRG/RTOG 0126, in patients with a lower tertile PORTOS, there was no difference in Phoenix biochemical failure (BF). However, for patients in the average and higher tertile PORTOS range, there was a significant benefit for DE for Phoenix BF. An interaction test indicated a significant difference in benefit for DE between higher and lower PORTOS groups. PORTOS was not strongly associated with clinicopathological variables in either trial or the large real-world dataset. In the latter, PORTOS was modestly associated with hypoxia signatures and strongly associated with immune signatures and subtypes.
CONCLUSION: In the SAKK 09/10 and RTOG 0126 randomized controlled trials, we demonstrated that PORTOS can potentially identify a subset of patients who benefit from DE, a subgroup that cannot be identified using clinicopathological or prognostic variables. These results suggest that PORTOS could be used clinically as a predictor of radiation response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PORTOS was evaluated in patients enrolled in SAKK 09/10 and NRG/RTOG 0126 with available tissue that passed quality control (n = 226, 215). PORTOS was evaluated in the published post-operative groups in SAKK 09/10 and in tertiles in NRG/RTOG 0126 as cut-offs had not been established for biopsy samples and definitive radiation patients. Clinical and molecular correlates in a real-world dataset of 42 407 prostatectomy and 31 107 biopsy samples were also analyzed.
RESULTS: In SAKK 09/10, the biomarker-treatment interaction was statistically significant between PORTOS (lower versus higher) and treatment arm for clinical progression-free survival. Only patients in the higher PORTOS group benefited from DE. In NRG/RTOG 0126, in patients with a lower tertile PORTOS, there was no difference in Phoenix biochemical failure (BF). However, for patients in the average and higher tertile PORTOS range, there was a significant benefit for DE for Phoenix BF. An interaction test indicated a significant difference in benefit for DE between higher and lower PORTOS groups. PORTOS was not strongly associated with clinicopathological variables in either trial or the large real-world dataset. In the latter, PORTOS was modestly associated with hypoxia signatures and strongly associated with immune signatures and subtypes.
CONCLUSION: In the SAKK 09/10 and RTOG 0126 randomized controlled trials, we demonstrated that PORTOS can potentially identify a subset of patients who benefit from DE, a subgroup that cannot be identified using clinicopathological or prognostic variables. These results suggest that PORTOS could be used clinically as a predictor of radiation response.