Journal of dentistry · 2025
Influence of different post-washing solutions on the mechanical and surface properties of 3D-printed material for definitive restorations: An in vitro study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Di Fiore Adolfo, Stellini Edoardo, Alsayed Hussain D, Alhotan Abdulaziz
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of three different wash solutions on the flexural strength (FS), elastic modulus (E), surface microhardness (VHN), surface roughness, water sorption (Wsp), and solubility (Wsl) of a 3D-printed glass-reinforced composite resin (3D-CR).
METHODS: VarseoSmile Crown Plus was printed at a 50 µm layer thickness and a 90° build angle. Three test groups were formed based on the ultrasonic bath wash solution: InovaPrint Wash (Group 1), 96 % ethanol (Group 2), and 90 % denatured ethyl alcohol (Group 3). Thirty bar-shaped specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm3), ten per group, were produced to measure FS and E using a three-point bending test, while five disk-shaped specimens (Ø 15 × 3 mm2) per group were employed to evaluate VHN. Both tests were conducted under dry conditions. Additionally, another set of five specimens (Ø 15 × 3 mm2) per group was used to assess surface roughness before and after simulated toothbrushing, while five disk-shaped specimens (Ø 15 × 1 mm2) were utilized to determine Wsp and Wsl over 28 days. Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni post hoc tests were applied for statistical group comparisons.
RESULTS: The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference between the groups in terms of FS (p = .008), E (p = .004) and in VHN (p = .001). Variations among groups were notable in Wsp and Wsl at 21 and 28 days (p = .001). Regarding the surface roughness, the specimens exhibited values surpassing the clinical acceptability threshold (0.2 μm) before and after brushing.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate washing protocols to optimize the long-term performance of 3D-printed composite resins.
CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Optimizing the washing protocol can mitigate the degradation of mechanical and surface properties in 3D-printed composite resins. This is a critical consideration for ensuring the long-term success of definitive restorations.
METHODS: VarseoSmile Crown Plus was printed at a 50 µm layer thickness and a 90° build angle. Three test groups were formed based on the ultrasonic bath wash solution: InovaPrint Wash (Group 1), 96 % ethanol (Group 2), and 90 % denatured ethyl alcohol (Group 3). Thirty bar-shaped specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm3), ten per group, were produced to measure FS and E using a three-point bending test, while five disk-shaped specimens (Ø 15 × 3 mm2) per group were employed to evaluate VHN. Both tests were conducted under dry conditions. Additionally, another set of five specimens (Ø 15 × 3 mm2) per group was used to assess surface roughness before and after simulated toothbrushing, while five disk-shaped specimens (Ø 15 × 1 mm2) were utilized to determine Wsp and Wsl over 28 days. Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni post hoc tests were applied for statistical group comparisons.
RESULTS: The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference between the groups in terms of FS (p = .008), E (p = .004) and in VHN (p = .001). Variations among groups were notable in Wsp and Wsl at 21 and 28 days (p = .001). Regarding the surface roughness, the specimens exhibited values surpassing the clinical acceptability threshold (0.2 μm) before and after brushing.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate washing protocols to optimize the long-term performance of 3D-printed composite resins.
CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Optimizing the washing protocol can mitigate the degradation of mechanical and surface properties in 3D-printed composite resins. This is a critical consideration for ensuring the long-term success of definitive restorations.