MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/ageing/afae129

Медицинская библиотека · Age and ageing · 2024

A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols.

Nydahl Peter, Liu Keibun, Bellelli Giuseppe, Benbenishty Julie, van den Boogaard Mark, Caplan Gideon, Chung Chi Ryang, Elhadi Muhammed, Gurjar Mohan, Heras-La Calle Gabi, Hoffmann Magdalena, Jeitziner Marie-Madlen, Krewulak Karla, Mailhot Tanya, Morandi Alessandro, Nawa Ricardo Kenji, Oh Esther S, Collet Marie O, Paulino Maria Carolina, Lindroth Heidi, von Haken Rebecca, WDAD Study Group

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023.

SETTING

Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities.

METHODS

Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers.

RESULTS

Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289-9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions.

CONCLUSION

Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.

Для цитирования: Nydahl Peter, Liu Keibun, Bellelli Giuseppe, Benbenishty Julie, van den Boogaard Mark, Caplan Gideon, Chung Chi Ryang, Elhadi Muhammed, Gurjar Mohan, Heras-La Calle Gabi, Hoffmann Magdalena, Jeitziner Marie-Madlen, Krewulak Karla, Mailhot Tanya, Morandi Alessandro, Nawa Ricardo Kenji, Oh Esther S, Collet Marie O, Paulino Maria Carolina, Lindroth Heidi, von Haken Rebecca, WDAD Study Group. A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols.. Age and ageing. 2024. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae129.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.