American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2015
Development of an opioid reduction protocol in an emergency department.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cohen Victor, Motov Sergey, Rockoff Bradley, Smith Andrew, Fromm Christian, Bosoy Dimitri, Hossain Rukhsana, Likourezos Antonios, Jellinek-Cohen Samantha P, Marshall John
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Results of a study of an opioid-sparing protocol for acute pain management in the emergency department (ED) are reported.
METHODS: The ED of a large hospital conducted a project, the "Opioid-Free Shift," to test a multimodal pharmacologic approach to analgesic therapy as an alternative to routine use of opioids. During a specified eight-hour period, all adults arriving at the ED with a complaint of pain were treated according to an opioid-sparing protocol based on principles of channel enzyme receptor-targeted analgesia (CERTA). Pain severity was assessed at baseline and at 30 and 60 minutes after analgesia administration using a validated rating scale.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated in the ED for acute or chronic pain during the study period. The median pain score on the 11-point rating scale was 8 (range, 4-10) at baseline, declining to 6 (range, 0-10) at 30 minutes and to 5 (range, 1-10) at 60 minutes. At 30 minutes, 7 patients (41%) had a pain score reduction of ≥ 30% and 3 (18%) had a reduction of ≥ 50%. Six of the 15 patients (40%) reassessed at 60 minutes had a pain score reduction of ≥ 30%; 4 patients (27%) had a reduction of ≥ 50%. More than 80% of patients were satisfied with the pain relief provided through the CERTA-based protocol, and no adverse drug reactions were reported.
CONCLUSION: The 17 patients treated for acute or chronic pain during the opioid-free shift were managed mainly with i.v. ketorolac and oral ibuprofen, with only 1 patient requiring rescue opioid therapy.
METHODS: The ED of a large hospital conducted a project, the "Opioid-Free Shift," to test a multimodal pharmacologic approach to analgesic therapy as an alternative to routine use of opioids. During a specified eight-hour period, all adults arriving at the ED with a complaint of pain were treated according to an opioid-sparing protocol based on principles of channel enzyme receptor-targeted analgesia (CERTA). Pain severity was assessed at baseline and at 30 and 60 minutes after analgesia administration using a validated rating scale.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated in the ED for acute or chronic pain during the study period. The median pain score on the 11-point rating scale was 8 (range, 4-10) at baseline, declining to 6 (range, 0-10) at 30 minutes and to 5 (range, 1-10) at 60 minutes. At 30 minutes, 7 patients (41%) had a pain score reduction of ≥ 30% and 3 (18%) had a reduction of ≥ 50%. Six of the 15 patients (40%) reassessed at 60 minutes had a pain score reduction of ≥ 30%; 4 patients (27%) had a reduction of ≥ 50%. More than 80% of patients were satisfied with the pain relief provided through the CERTA-based protocol, and no adverse drug reactions were reported.
CONCLUSION: The 17 patients treated for acute or chronic pain during the opioid-free shift were managed mainly with i.v. ketorolac and oral ibuprofen, with only 1 patient requiring rescue opioid therapy.