DOI 10.1016/j.medmal.2014.12.003
Acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli in intensive care unit: predictors and molecular epidemiology.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
We had for aim to determine the risk factors for acquiring carbapenem-intermediate or -resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) in an intensive care unit (ICU) and to identify the resistance mechanisms involved.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
We conducted an observational prospective cohort study during 6 months in medical and surgical ICUs of the Besançon Teaching Hospital. Patients with acquired CR-GNB were patients whose cultures (screening or diagnosis) became positive more than 48h after admission to the ICU. The risk factors for ICU-acquired CR-GNB were determined by multivariate logistic regression. CR-GNB isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and screened for resistance mechanisms with phenotypic and genotypic tests.
RESULTS
Twenty-three of the 347 included patients had acquired a CR-GNB. The multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between this acquisition and the duration of previous treatments with piperacillin-tazobactam (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.13, P=0.02) and aminoglycosides (aOR, 1.62; P=0.005), but not with carbapenems. The CR-GNB strains were identified as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=10), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n=7), and Enterobacter cloacae (n=6). No acquired carbapenemase-producing strain was identified. PFGE typing identified 1 multiple clone among P. aeruginosa isolates (4 patients), whereas for the other bacteria, all the strains were different.
CONCLUSION
Our study results suggest that the strategy to prevent the emergence and spread of CR-GNB should not be limited to the sole restriction of carbapenem use in ICU settings.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.