International urology and nephrology · 2019
The effect of trimetazidine on preventing contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lian Xingji, He Wenfei, Zhan Huimin, Chen Jiyan, Tan Ning, He Pengcheng, Liu Yuanhui
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Trimetazidine has been shown to prevent the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the effect of trimetazidine on CIN in unselected patients is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the effect of trimetazidine on preventing CIN in unselected patients treated with PCI.
METHODS: 2154 consecutive patients were enrolled and divided into the trimetazidine (n = 529) and non-trimetazidine group (n = 1625). Patients in the trimetazidine group received trimetazidine 20 mg thrice daily starting at least 24 h before the procedure and continuing until discharge. The primary outcome was CIN.
RESULTS: CIN was observed in 197 (9.2%) patients. The incidence of CIN was similar between two groups (9.1% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.947). After adjusting for other potential risk factors, trimetazidine did not significantly reduce the risk of CIN (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.46-1.08, P = 0.104). The results remained similar when using the alternate definitions of CIN and different subgroup analysis based on diabetes or chronic kidney disease. In additional, no significant difference between two groups was found with respect to in-hospital major adverse clinical events (1.89% vs. 1.66%, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Trimetazidine did not exert significant renal protective effect on preventing CIN and in hosptial major adverse clinical events in unselected patients undergoing PCI.
METHODS: 2154 consecutive patients were enrolled and divided into the trimetazidine (n = 529) and non-trimetazidine group (n = 1625). Patients in the trimetazidine group received trimetazidine 20 mg thrice daily starting at least 24 h before the procedure and continuing until discharge. The primary outcome was CIN.
RESULTS: CIN was observed in 197 (9.2%) patients. The incidence of CIN was similar between two groups (9.1% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.947). After adjusting for other potential risk factors, trimetazidine did not significantly reduce the risk of CIN (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.46-1.08, P = 0.104). The results remained similar when using the alternate definitions of CIN and different subgroup analysis based on diabetes or chronic kidney disease. In additional, no significant difference between two groups was found with respect to in-hospital major adverse clinical events (1.89% vs. 1.66%, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Trimetazidine did not exert significant renal protective effect on preventing CIN and in hosptial major adverse clinical events in unselected patients undergoing PCI.