Annals of translational medicine · 2022
Function, quality-of-life and complications after sacrospinous ligament fixation using an antegrade reusable suturing device (ARSD-Ney) at 6 and 12 months: a retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Ping, Li Mingyue, Sun Huating, Ni Liping, Cai Honghong, Fan Wen, Zhou Jinhua, Wang Juan, Ding Hongmei, Chen Youguo, Shen Fangrong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common pathology in the female population. Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is one of the traditional transvaginal procedures for POP and high sacrospinous ligament fixation (h-SSLF) optimizes it using an antegrade reusable suturing device (ARSD-Ney). Previous studies on h-SSLF have focused on the correction of anatomical positions, with less assessment of patients' function, quality of life and complications. In this study, we evaluated post-operative complications, function, and quality-of-life after h-SSLF to confirm the safety and effectiveness of it.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included 71 patients between 2018 and 2021: 50 patients for h-SSLF and 21 patients for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) according to patient age and background, POP-Q stage, patient preference, and so on. A clinical evaluation took place before surgery and was repeated at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Intra- and post-operative complications and anatomical results were recorded. Patients completed self-administered questionnaires for functional pelvic problems [Pelvic Floor Disability Index-20 (PFDI-20)], quality of life [Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7)], and sexual function [Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12 (PISQ-12)] at each medical visit.
RESULTS: Patients in both h-SSLF and LSC groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics except for surgery time (86.04±28.70 vs. 153.19±54.88, P<0.05), postoperative indwelling catheter time (3.88±1.65 vs. 4.90±1.84, P<0.05), and hospital stay (8.94±2.38 vs. 10.57±2.06, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in scores of PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, and PISQ-12 at pre- and post-operative 6 and 12 months (P>0.05). Functional pelvic problems (PFDI-20 scores) and their impact on patients' quality of life (PFIQ-7 scores) significantly improved at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P<0.05). Improvements in sexual activity were noted at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study confirmed the positive results of h-SSLF in terms of improvement in function and quality of life following treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included 71 patients between 2018 and 2021: 50 patients for h-SSLF and 21 patients for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) according to patient age and background, POP-Q stage, patient preference, and so on. A clinical evaluation took place before surgery and was repeated at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Intra- and post-operative complications and anatomical results were recorded. Patients completed self-administered questionnaires for functional pelvic problems [Pelvic Floor Disability Index-20 (PFDI-20)], quality of life [Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7)], and sexual function [Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12 (PISQ-12)] at each medical visit.
RESULTS: Patients in both h-SSLF and LSC groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics except for surgery time (86.04±28.70 vs. 153.19±54.88, P<0.05), postoperative indwelling catheter time (3.88±1.65 vs. 4.90±1.84, P<0.05), and hospital stay (8.94±2.38 vs. 10.57±2.06, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in scores of PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, and PISQ-12 at pre- and post-operative 6 and 12 months (P>0.05). Functional pelvic problems (PFDI-20 scores) and their impact on patients' quality of life (PFIQ-7 scores) significantly improved at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P<0.05). Improvements in sexual activity were noted at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study confirmed the positive results of h-SSLF in terms of improvement in function and quality of life following treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.