Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
In-Hospital or Out-of-Hospital Initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Patients With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction After A Worsening Heart Failure Event: The PARAGLIDE-HF Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nouhravesh Nina, Cyr Derek, Hernandez Adrian F, Morrow David A, Velazquez Eric J, Ward Jonathan, Sarwat Samiha, Sharma Kavita, Williamson Kristin, Starling Randall C, Lepage Serge, Zieroth Shelley, Solomon Scott D, Mentz Robert J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Efficacy and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is not well characterized in heart failure (HF) with ejection fraction >40% initiated in-hospital. Thus, this prespecified PARAGLIDE-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Given Following Stabilization In Decompensated HFpEF) analysis assessed the effects of Sac/Val versus valsartan (Val) by location of initiation in HF with ejection fraction >40% and recent worsening HF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: This analysis of the double-blind, randomized controlled trial assessed patients by in-hospital and out-of-hospital (≤30 days of worsening HF) initiation. The primary end point was time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) from baseline through weeks 4 and 8. A secondary hierarchical outcome consisted of cardiovascular death, HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, and NT-proBNP change. Safety end points were symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, and worsening renal function. Overall, 324 (70%, 162 Sac/Val, 162 Val) were initiated in-hospital and 142 (71 Sac/Val, 71 Val) out-of-hospital. There was no evidence of a statistically significant differential treatment benefit of Sac/Val versus Val on NT-proBNP change by location of initiation (in-hospital, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.70-1.05] and out-of-hospital, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-1.09]; Pinteraction=0.99). The win ratio for the hierarchical outcome was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.82-1.45; P=0.57) for in-hospital and 1.43 (95% CI, 0.91-2.26; P=0.12) for out-of-hospital. For the safety end points of symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, and worsening renal function, no statistically significant differences in tolerability were seen between in-hospital and out-hospital initiation (Pinteraction>0.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Sac/Val provided consistent benefit compared with Val, whether initiated in-hospital or out-of-hospital in HF with ejection fraction >40% with a recent worsening HF event, demonstrating an opportunity to improve postdischarge outcomes by initiating Sac/Val during hospitalization.
METHODS AND RESULTS: This analysis of the double-blind, randomized controlled trial assessed patients by in-hospital and out-of-hospital (≤30 days of worsening HF) initiation. The primary end point was time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) from baseline through weeks 4 and 8. A secondary hierarchical outcome consisted of cardiovascular death, HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, and NT-proBNP change. Safety end points were symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, and worsening renal function. Overall, 324 (70%, 162 Sac/Val, 162 Val) were initiated in-hospital and 142 (71 Sac/Val, 71 Val) out-of-hospital. There was no evidence of a statistically significant differential treatment benefit of Sac/Val versus Val on NT-proBNP change by location of initiation (in-hospital, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.70-1.05] and out-of-hospital, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-1.09]; Pinteraction=0.99). The win ratio for the hierarchical outcome was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.82-1.45; P=0.57) for in-hospital and 1.43 (95% CI, 0.91-2.26; P=0.12) for out-of-hospital. For the safety end points of symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, and worsening renal function, no statistically significant differences in tolerability were seen between in-hospital and out-hospital initiation (Pinteraction>0.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Sac/Val provided consistent benefit compared with Val, whether initiated in-hospital or out-of-hospital in HF with ejection fraction >40% with a recent worsening HF event, demonstrating an opportunity to improve postdischarge outcomes by initiating Sac/Val during hospitalization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiomarkersDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsHeart FailureHospitalizationHyperkalemiaNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsProspective StudiesStroke VolumeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeValsartanVentricular Function, LeftAminobutyratesBiphenyl Compounds