MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104643

Медицинская библиотека · Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2025

Key considerations for a prostate cancer mRNA vaccine.

Lin Guanjie, Elkashif Ahmed, Saha Chayanika, Coulter Jonathan A, Dunne Nicholas J, McCarthy Helen O

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Prostate cancer has the second highest cancer mortality rate in the UK in males. Early prostate cancer is typically asymptomatic, with diagnosis at a locally advanced or metastatic stage. In addition, the inherent heterogeneity of prostate cancer tumours differs significantly in terms of genetic, molecular, and histological features. The successful treatment of prostate cancer is therefore exceedingly challenging. Immunotherapies, particularly therapeutic vaccines, have been widely used in preclinical and clinical studies to treat various cancers. Sipuleucel-T was the first cancer vaccine approved by the FDA for the treatment of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), ushering in a new era of immunotherapy. In this review, the latest immunotherapy strategies for prostate cancer are considered with key tumour-associated antigens (TAA) and tumour-specific antigens (TSA) highlighted. The key components of mRNA vaccines include in vitro transcription, stability, and immunogenicity. Finally, strategies to circumvent in vivo mRNA degradation and approaches to optimise in vitro transcription (IVT) process are also discussed.

Для цитирования: Lin Guanjie, Elkashif Ahmed, Saha Chayanika, Coulter Jonathan A, Dunne Nicholas J, McCarthy Helen O. Key considerations for a prostate cancer mRNA vaccine.. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104643.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.