Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2025
Real-world clinical usage and efficacy of apalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study in the CsJUC.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tohi Yoichiro, Kobayashi Keita, Daizumoto Kei, Sekino Yohei, Fukuhara Hideo, Niigawa Heima, Katayama Satoshi, Shimizu Ryutaro, Takamoto Atsushi, Nishimura Kenichi, Nagami Taichi, Hayashida Yushi, Hirama Hiromi, Shiraishi Koji, Tomida Ryotaro, Kobatake Kohei, Inoue Keiji, Miyaji Yoshiyuki, Bekku Kensuke, Morizane Shuichi, Miura Noriyoshi, Wada Koichiro, Sugimoto Mikio, Chu-shikoku Japan Urological Consortium
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-world clinical usage and effectiveness of apalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 186 men who received apalutamide across 17 institutions. The primary outcomes were the clinical usage of apalutamide for nmCRPC: prior usage of other androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), prior radical treatment, and the distribution of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSA-DT) at the initial administration of apalutamide. The secondary outcomes were the efficacy of apalutamide: PSA response (50% or 90% decline), progression-free survival, and skin-adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: We identified 75 patients with nmCRPC. A total of 31 (41.3%) patients received prior treatment with other ARSIs. A total of 42 men (56%) did not receive any prior radical treatment. The PSA-DT was <3.0, 3.0-5.9, 6.0-10, and > 10 months in 34.7%, 40%, 14.7%, and 10.6% of the patients, respectively. Patients receiving prior treatment with other ARSIs showed a significantly lower PSA response (PSA 50% decline, 88.4% vs. 18.8%; PSA 90% decline, 60.5% vs. 6.2%, P < .001, respectively) and significantly shorter progression-free survival (median: 37 months vs. 4 months; log-rank P < .001) than those without prior ARSI treatment, although cancer status did not differ between the groups. Skin-AEs were observed in 42.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study revealed that apalutamide was used for the treatment after other ARSIs in >40% of patients with nmCRPC and showed limited efficacy in this context, although the effectiveness of apalutamide without prior other ARSI treatment was comparable with that reported in clinical trial results.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 186 men who received apalutamide across 17 institutions. The primary outcomes were the clinical usage of apalutamide for nmCRPC: prior usage of other androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), prior radical treatment, and the distribution of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSA-DT) at the initial administration of apalutamide. The secondary outcomes were the efficacy of apalutamide: PSA response (50% or 90% decline), progression-free survival, and skin-adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: We identified 75 patients with nmCRPC. A total of 31 (41.3%) patients received prior treatment with other ARSIs. A total of 42 men (56%) did not receive any prior radical treatment. The PSA-DT was <3.0, 3.0-5.9, 6.0-10, and > 10 months in 34.7%, 40%, 14.7%, and 10.6% of the patients, respectively. Patients receiving prior treatment with other ARSIs showed a significantly lower PSA response (PSA 50% decline, 88.4% vs. 18.8%; PSA 90% decline, 60.5% vs. 6.2%, P < .001, respectively) and significantly shorter progression-free survival (median: 37 months vs. 4 months; log-rank P < .001) than those without prior ARSI treatment, although cancer status did not differ between the groups. Skin-AEs were observed in 42.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study revealed that apalutamide was used for the treatment after other ARSIs in >40% of patients with nmCRPC and showed limited efficacy in this context, although the effectiveness of apalutamide without prior other ARSI treatment was comparable with that reported in clinical trial results.