World neurosurgery · 2019
Carotid Cavernous Fistulas and Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas of the Cavernous Sinus: Validation of a New Classification According to Venous Drainage.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leone Giuseppe, Renieri Leonardo, Enriquez-Marulanda Alejandro, Dmytriw Adam A, Nappini Sergio, Laiso Antonio, Buono Giuseppe, Marseglia Mariano, Iuliano Adriana, Muto Mario, Briganti Francesco, Mangiafico Salvatore, Limbucci Nicola
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Multiple carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) classifications have been proposed. However, they lacked predictive factors for the clinical presentation, natural history, and hemorrhagic risk. Our aim was to externally validate a new classification according to venous drainage (i.e., the Thomas classification [TC]) to assess its relationship with symptoms, endovascular treatment, and outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective review of CCFs at 2 major academic institutions. The CCFs were classified using the Barrow classification (BC) and TC systems.
RESULTS: The data from 94 patients with a diagnosis of CCF were collected during a study period 23 years, 4 months. Of these 94 patients, 89 had undergone CCF treatment and 5 had experienced spontaneous occlusion. Complete occlusion was achieved in 89.9% of the treated patients. Complications occurred in 5.3% of the patients, including permanent deficits in 2.1%. TC type 4 was associated with cortical symptoms compared with type 2 (P = 0.003) and type 3 (P < 0.001). The BC was not able to detect significant differences among the symptom types. Significant differences were found using the TC for the transarterial-only, transvenous anterior-only, and transvenous posterior-only approaches (P < 0.001, P = 0.03, and P = 0.001, respectively). The transvenous posterior and transvenous anterior approach were significantly associated with type 2 and 3 TC, respectively. Excluding direct CCFs, the BC was not related to the treatment approach. No significant differences in the outcomes were found. However, a trend toward a lower occlusion rate for TC type 4 compared with type 3 was observed.
CONCLUSION: The TC provided useful information regarding the fistula anatomy and venous hemodynamics, which correlated with the clinical symptoms and treatment strategy.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective review of CCFs at 2 major academic institutions. The CCFs were classified using the Barrow classification (BC) and TC systems.
RESULTS: The data from 94 patients with a diagnosis of CCF were collected during a study period 23 years, 4 months. Of these 94 patients, 89 had undergone CCF treatment and 5 had experienced spontaneous occlusion. Complete occlusion was achieved in 89.9% of the treated patients. Complications occurred in 5.3% of the patients, including permanent deficits in 2.1%. TC type 4 was associated with cortical symptoms compared with type 2 (P = 0.003) and type 3 (P < 0.001). The BC was not able to detect significant differences among the symptom types. Significant differences were found using the TC for the transarterial-only, transvenous anterior-only, and transvenous posterior-only approaches (P < 0.001, P = 0.03, and P = 0.001, respectively). The transvenous posterior and transvenous anterior approach were significantly associated with type 2 and 3 TC, respectively. Excluding direct CCFs, the BC was not related to the treatment approach. No significant differences in the outcomes were found. However, a trend toward a lower occlusion rate for TC type 4 compared with type 3 was observed.
CONCLUSION: The TC provided useful information regarding the fistula anatomy and venous hemodynamics, which correlated with the clinical symptoms and treatment strategy.