MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/aap.0000000000000206

Медицинская библиотека · Regional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2015

The training and careers of regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine fellows, 2013.

Neal Joseph M, Liguori Gregory A, Hargett Mary J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Fellowships in regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine (RAAPM) have grown exponentially during the past decade, both in terms of total programs and fellows trained. This survey-based study reports fellowship graduates' assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of their training and how the fellowship has affected their careers.

METHODS

Graduates of North American RAAPM fellowships were asked to participate in a 16-question survey designed to describe their training and subsequent career. Academic anesthesiology department chairs were simultaneously surveyed to determine how the RAAPM components of their residency training programs are staffed and organized.

RESULTS

Graduate and department chair response rates were 59% and 44%, respectively. During the past decade, significant improvements have occurred in peripheral nerve block, perineural catheter, and acute pain medicine training. Many fellowship graduates note less robust educational experiences in research and the nontechnical aspects of the subspecialty.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study should prove useful to fellowship directors as they refine the educational offerings of their programs.

Для цитирования: Neal Joseph M, Liguori Gregory A, Hargett Mary J. The training and careers of regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine fellows, 2013.. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1097/aap.0000000000000206.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.