Research and reports in urology · 2025
The Role of Immunohistochemistry for AMACR/p504s and p63 in Distinguishing Prostate Cancer from Benign Prostate Tissue Samples in Botswana.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ramatlho Pleasure, Rugemalila Moses Muganyizi, Tawe Leabaneng, Pain Debanjan, Choga Ontlametse T, Ndlovu Andrew Khulekani, Koobotse Moses O, Lal Priti, Rebbeck Timothy R, Paganotti Giacomo M, Narasimhamurthy Mohan, Kyokunda Lynnette Tumwine
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (CaP) is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men in Botswana. Currently, diagnosing CaP relies on examining prostate biopsy samples, which can be challenging due to benign mimics. This study aims to evaluate the potential of Alpha-methyl acyl-CoA racemase (AMACR/p504s) and p63, as diagnostic markers for CaP. This may potentially validate the use of immunohistochemistry for detecting CaP in Botswana, where it is not routinely utilized.
METHODS: The study included 69 samples, comprising 5 prostatic chip specimens, 50 core biopsies, and 14 radical prostatectomy specimens. These cases were reviewed and categorized into CaP (49 cases) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (20 cases). Immunohistochemistry was performed using AMACR/p504s and p63 immunohistochemical stains.
RESULTS: The study found that AMACR/p504s had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 95%, while p63 had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. PSA levels showed significant positive correlation with AMACR/p504s expression (P < 0.00001).
DISCUSSION: In this study, we have demonstrated the diagnostic utility of AMACR/p504s and p63 due to their high sensitivity and specificity in detecting CaP in Botswana, where these biomarkers are not yet widely used. Furthermore, utilizing these markers in conjunction with other diagnostic tools, such as PSA levels and morphological evaluation, could improve the diagnostic accuracy, especially in challenging cases where histopathological examination alone may be inconclusive.
METHODS: The study included 69 samples, comprising 5 prostatic chip specimens, 50 core biopsies, and 14 radical prostatectomy specimens. These cases were reviewed and categorized into CaP (49 cases) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (20 cases). Immunohistochemistry was performed using AMACR/p504s and p63 immunohistochemical stains.
RESULTS: The study found that AMACR/p504s had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 95%, while p63 had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. PSA levels showed significant positive correlation with AMACR/p504s expression (P < 0.00001).
DISCUSSION: In this study, we have demonstrated the diagnostic utility of AMACR/p504s and p63 due to their high sensitivity and specificity in detecting CaP in Botswana, where these biomarkers are not yet widely used. Furthermore, utilizing these markers in conjunction with other diagnostic tools, such as PSA levels and morphological evaluation, could improve the diagnostic accuracy, especially in challenging cases where histopathological examination alone may be inconclusive.