ERJ open research · 2024
High-frequency percussive ventilation in acute respiratory failure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bruni Andrea, Neri Giuseppe, Cammarota Gianmaria, Bosco Vincenzo, Biamonte Eugenio, Troisi Letizia, Boscolo Annalisa, Navalesi Paolo, Longhini Federico, Garofalo Eugenio
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: High-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) is a ventilation mode characterised by high-frequency breaths. This study investigated the impact of HFPV on gas exchange and clinical outcomes in acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients during spontaneous breathing, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV).
METHODS: This systematic review included randomised and nonrandomised studies up to August 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on adult ARF patients, HFPV application, comparisons with other ventilation modes, and outcomes related to oxygenation and clinical parameters. A pooled data analysis was performed comparing HFPV with iMV concerning gas exchange, pulmonary infection and mortality.
RESULTS: Of the 51 identified records, 29 met the inclusion criteria. HFPV was safely and effectively applied to ARF patients during spontaneous breathing or NIV, improving oxygenation. For patients who underwent iMV, HFPV significantly enhanced oxygenation and the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, reduced pulmonary infection occurrence and improved survival. Barotrauma rates were not elevated with HFPV, and haemodynamic stability remained unaffected. HFPV was also utilised in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, resulting in improved lung recruitment and oxygenation.
CONCLUSION: HFPV had favourable effects on physiological and certain clinical outcomes in ARF patients. However, the overall evidence quality remains weak, necessitating large-scale randomised controlled trials for definitive conclusions.
METHODS: This systematic review included randomised and nonrandomised studies up to August 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on adult ARF patients, HFPV application, comparisons with other ventilation modes, and outcomes related to oxygenation and clinical parameters. A pooled data analysis was performed comparing HFPV with iMV concerning gas exchange, pulmonary infection and mortality.
RESULTS: Of the 51 identified records, 29 met the inclusion criteria. HFPV was safely and effectively applied to ARF patients during spontaneous breathing or NIV, improving oxygenation. For patients who underwent iMV, HFPV significantly enhanced oxygenation and the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, reduced pulmonary infection occurrence and improved survival. Barotrauma rates were not elevated with HFPV, and haemodynamic stability remained unaffected. HFPV was also utilised in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, resulting in improved lung recruitment and oxygenation.
CONCLUSION: HFPV had favourable effects on physiological and certain clinical outcomes in ARF patients. However, the overall evidence quality remains weak, necessitating large-scale randomised controlled trials for definitive conclusions.