The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024
Central nervous system distributional kinetics of selected histone deacetylase inhibitors.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Wenqiu, Oh Ju-Hee, Zhang Wenjuan, Aldrich Courtney C, Sirianni Rachael W, Elmquist William F
Аннотация
Histone deacetylase expression and activity are often dysregulated in central nervous system (CNS) tumors, providing a rationale for investigating histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) in selected brain tumor patients. Although many HDACIs have shown potential in in vitro studies, they have had modest efficacy in vivo. This lack of activity could be due to insufficient CNS exposure to the unbound drug. In this study, we investigated the systemic pharmacokinetics and subsequent CNS distribution of 2 potent HDACIs, vorinostat and quisinostat, in the murine model. Both compounds undergo in vitro degradation in mouse plasma, requiring precautions during sample processing. They also have short half-lives in vivo, in both plasma and the CNS, which may lead to diminished efficacy. Transgenic transporter-deficient mouse models show that the CNS delivery of vorinostat was not limited by the 2 major blood-brain barrier efflux transporters, p-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein. Vorinostat had an unbound CNS tissue-to-plasma partition coefficient of 0.06 ± 0.02. Conversely, the exposure of unbound quisinostat in the brain was only 0.02 ± 0.001 of that in the plasma, and the CNS distribution of quisinostat was limited by the activity of p-glycoprotein. To gain further context for these findings, the CNS distributional kinetics for vorinostat and quisinostat were compared with another hydroxamic acid HDACI, panobinostat. A comprehensive understanding of the CNS target exposure to unbound HDACI, along with known potencies from in vitro testing, can inform the prediction of a therapeutic window for HDACIs that have limited CNS exposure to unbound drug and guide targeted dosing strategies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study indicates that quisinostat and vorinostat are susceptible to enzymatic degradation in the plasma, and to a lesser degree, in the target central nervous system (CNS) tissues. Employing techniques that minimize the postsampling degradation in plasma, brain, and spinal cord, accurate CNS distributional kinetic parameters for these potentially useful compounds were determined. A knowledge of CNS exposure, time to peak, and duration can inform dosing strategies in preclinical and clinical trials in selected CNS tumors.