Minerva cardiology and angiology · 2021
Clinical features and outcomes between African American and Caucasian patients with Takotsubo Syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ravindra Krishna, Del Buono Marco G, Chiabrando Juan G, Westman Peter, Bressi Edoardo, Kadariya Dinesh, Maehara Curtis, Dell Megan, Ma Liangsuo, VAN Wezenbeek Jessie, Moeller F Gerard, Keyser-Marcus Lori, Keen Larry D, Gal Tamas S, Abbate Antonio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Takotsubo syndrome (TS) is an acute, reversible form of heart failure, often mimicking an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Data regarding racial differences in TS are inconsistent. The aim is to assess clinical features associated with unfavorable in-hospital outcomes between African American (AA) and Caucasian (CAU) patients.
METHODS: A retrospective electronic health record query identified 44 AA patients and 110 CAU patients with a diagnosis of TS. Our primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, and cardiogenic shock during hospitalization. Variables associated with an increased risk of the primary composite outcomes were included in a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Compared to CAU patients, AA patients were a more comorbid population, and presented a higher prevalence of history of illicit drug use (27.3% vs. 13.6% P=0.044). There were no significant differences regarding in-hospital complication rates between AA and CAU patients. In the logistic regression model, infection was associated with greater risk of developing the primary outcome in AA patients (OR=7.26 [95% CI 1.22-43.17], P=0.029), whereas angina was a protective factor (OR=0.11 [95% CI 0.02-0.65], P=0.015). In CAU patients, severely depressed ejection fraction and worse peak creatinine during hospitalization increased risk of developing the primary outcome (OR=5.88 95% CI [2.01-17.17], P<0.001 and OR=1.64 [95% CI 1.15-2.58], P=0.031, respectively). Meanwhile, emotional stressors were protective (OR=0.16 [95% CI 0.03-0.88], P=0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite experiencing the same rate of in-hospital complications, the clinical profiles of AA patients are distinct from CAU patients admitted for TS, and clinical variables correlated with worse in-hospital outcomes also differ by race.
METHODS: A retrospective electronic health record query identified 44 AA patients and 110 CAU patients with a diagnosis of TS. Our primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, and cardiogenic shock during hospitalization. Variables associated with an increased risk of the primary composite outcomes were included in a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Compared to CAU patients, AA patients were a more comorbid population, and presented a higher prevalence of history of illicit drug use (27.3% vs. 13.6% P=0.044). There were no significant differences regarding in-hospital complication rates between AA and CAU patients. In the logistic regression model, infection was associated with greater risk of developing the primary outcome in AA patients (OR=7.26 [95% CI 1.22-43.17], P=0.029), whereas angina was a protective factor (OR=0.11 [95% CI 0.02-0.65], P=0.015). In CAU patients, severely depressed ejection fraction and worse peak creatinine during hospitalization increased risk of developing the primary outcome (OR=5.88 95% CI [2.01-17.17], P<0.001 and OR=1.64 [95% CI 1.15-2.58], P=0.031, respectively). Meanwhile, emotional stressors were protective (OR=0.16 [95% CI 0.03-0.88], P=0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite experiencing the same rate of in-hospital complications, the clinical profiles of AA patients are distinct from CAU patients admitted for TS, and clinical variables correlated with worse in-hospital outcomes also differ by race.