HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2021
Accuracy comparison of MR elastography and biological markers in detecting liver fibrosis and predicting postoperative ascites.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sato Naoya, Kenjo Akira, Nishimagi Atsushi, Kimura Takashi, Okada Ryo, Ishigame Teruhide, Kofunato Yasuhide, Yamada Shoki, Hashimoto Yuko, Marubashi Shigeru
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to compare the discriminative performance between magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and biological markers in detecting liver fibrosis and in predicting postoperative ascites (PA).
METHODS: We enrolled 77 patients consecutively who underwent hepatectomy between March 2017 and June 2019. Liver fibrosis was histopathologically graded using the METAVIR scoring system as reference. Discriminative performance of non-invasive assessments in detecting different stages of liver fibrosis and predicting PA was evaluated by receiver-operator curve analysis.
RESULTS: The concordance indices (C-indices) for MRE and biological markers for detecting significant fibrosis (≥F2) and cirrhosis (F4) were: MRE, 0.84 and 0.86; Wisteria floribunda agglutinin + Mac-2 binding protein (WM2BP), 0.63 and 0.71; Hyaluronic acid (HA), 0.72 and 0.75; 7 S-type 4 collagen (T4C), 0.61 and 0.66; APRI, 0.76 and 0.83; and Fib-4, 0.75 and 0.76. Univariable logistic analysis for predicting PA showed that C-indices were 0.751 (p = 0.007), 0.798 (p = 0.106), 0.771 (p = 0.050), 0.674 (p = 0.855), 0.655 (p = 0.263), and 0.560 (p = 0.640) for MRE, WM2BP, Fib-4, HA, APRI, and T4C, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRE has a higher diagnostic performance than biological markers in detecting the stages of liver fibrosis and is a predictor for PA after hepatectomy.
METHODS: We enrolled 77 patients consecutively who underwent hepatectomy between March 2017 and June 2019. Liver fibrosis was histopathologically graded using the METAVIR scoring system as reference. Discriminative performance of non-invasive assessments in detecting different stages of liver fibrosis and predicting PA was evaluated by receiver-operator curve analysis.
RESULTS: The concordance indices (C-indices) for MRE and biological markers for detecting significant fibrosis (≥F2) and cirrhosis (F4) were: MRE, 0.84 and 0.86; Wisteria floribunda agglutinin + Mac-2 binding protein (WM2BP), 0.63 and 0.71; Hyaluronic acid (HA), 0.72 and 0.75; 7 S-type 4 collagen (T4C), 0.61 and 0.66; APRI, 0.76 and 0.83; and Fib-4, 0.75 and 0.76. Univariable logistic analysis for predicting PA showed that C-indices were 0.751 (p = 0.007), 0.798 (p = 0.106), 0.771 (p = 0.050), 0.674 (p = 0.855), 0.655 (p = 0.263), and 0.560 (p = 0.640) for MRE, WM2BP, Fib-4, HA, APRI, and T4C, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRE has a higher diagnostic performance than biological markers in detecting the stages of liver fibrosis and is a predictor for PA after hepatectomy.