Journal of critical care · 2008
District nurses' attitudes toward patient consent: the case of mechanical ventilation on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: results from a French national survey.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peretti-Watel Patrick, Bendiane Marc-Karim, Galinier Anne, Favre Roger, Ribiere Claude, Lapiana Jean-Marc, Obadia Yolande
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In France, a recent law emphasizes patient rights and prohibits unwanted therapies in end-of-life care. As end-of-life home care is increasing, we aimed to assess French district nurses' attitudes toward terminally ill patients' autonomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used data from a nationwide telephone survey conducted in 2005 among a random sample of French district nurses (n = 602). Nurses' attitudes were assessed with a clinical case describing a patient (randomly defined as a male or a female aged 50 years) having amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) who urgently needs mechanical ventilation. Nurses were asked whether patient consent was necessary before performing intubation/tracheotomy, and the analysis took into account various covariates, including nurses' religiosity, nurses' attitudes toward living wills, and patient sex.
RESULTS: Overall, 44% of nurses considered that an ALS patient with respiratory failure should always be intubated (53% for a female patient, 40% for a male patient, P < .01), and after intubation, 27% upheld tracheotomy without considering patient consent as a necessary prerequisite (39% among male nurses, 30% among female nurses, P < .05). Poor communication with terminal patients and hostility toward living will were also predictive of willingness to perform both mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy without patient consent.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant part of French district nurses may have a disturbing propensity to support intubation and tracheotomy with insufficient attention paid to the patient's will. Further research should investigate potential causal factors (such as increased workload) as well as sex-related attitudes in nurse-patient relationship.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used data from a nationwide telephone survey conducted in 2005 among a random sample of French district nurses (n = 602). Nurses' attitudes were assessed with a clinical case describing a patient (randomly defined as a male or a female aged 50 years) having amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) who urgently needs mechanical ventilation. Nurses were asked whether patient consent was necessary before performing intubation/tracheotomy, and the analysis took into account various covariates, including nurses' religiosity, nurses' attitudes toward living wills, and patient sex.
RESULTS: Overall, 44% of nurses considered that an ALS patient with respiratory failure should always be intubated (53% for a female patient, 40% for a male patient, P < .01), and after intubation, 27% upheld tracheotomy without considering patient consent as a necessary prerequisite (39% among male nurses, 30% among female nurses, P < .05). Poor communication with terminal patients and hostility toward living will were also predictive of willingness to perform both mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy without patient consent.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant part of French district nurses may have a disturbing propensity to support intubation and tracheotomy with insufficient attention paid to the patient's will. Further research should investigate potential causal factors (such as increased workload) as well as sex-related attitudes in nurse-patient relationship.