MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00157.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry · 2014

Ultrastructural and elemental analysis of sialoliths and their comparison with nephroliths.

Rakesh Nagaraju, Bhoomareddy Kantharaj Yashoda Devi, Agarwal Manjushree, Agarwal Kunal

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: Sialoliths are common in the submandibular gland and its duct system, although their exact cause of formation is still a matter of debate. The aims of this study were to: (a) analyze sialoliths ultrastructurally, and to determine the role of foreign bodies or organic materials in the formation of sialolith nuclei; and (b) compare nephroliths with sialoliths ultrastructurally.

METHODS

Three sialoliths and two nephroliths were analyzed ultrastructurally by a scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffractometer.

RESULTS

The main structures of the sialoliths were found to be hydroxyapatite crystals. No organic cores were observed in the central parts of the sialoliths. In nephroliths, calcium oxalate, calcium phosphate, and struvite crystals were found. The energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis found that sialoliths and nephroliths were predominantly composed of elements comprising calcium, phosphorous, magnesium, sodium, chloride, silicon, iron, and potassium.

CONCLUSION

Sialoliths in the submandibular salivary glands might form secondary to sialadenitis, but not via a luminal organic nidus.

Для цитирования: Rakesh Nagaraju, Bhoomareddy Kantharaj Yashoda Devi, Agarwal Manjushree, Agarwal Kunal. Ultrastructural and elemental analysis of sialoliths and their comparison with nephroliths.. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry. 2014. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00157.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.