The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2018
The Role of GDF-15 in Heart Failure Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Benes Jan, Kotrc Martin, Wohlfahrt Peter, Conrad Michael J, Franekova Janka, Jabor Antonin, Lupinek Petr, Kautzner Josef, Melenovsky Vojtech, Jarolim Petr
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a stress-inducible cytokine and member of the transforming growth factor-β cytokine superfamily that refines prognostic assessment in subgroups of patients with heart failure (HF). We evaluated its role in HF patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2).
METHODS: A total of 358 patients with stable systolic HF were followed for a median of 1121 (interquartile range, 379-2600) days. Comprehensive evaluation including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and GDF-15 testing was performed at study entry; the analysis was stratified according to kidney function.
RESULTS: Patients with CKD (33.8%) were older, had more often diabetes, and were less often treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). GDF-15 was associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate, whereas BNP was associated with left ventricular-end diastolic diameter and ejection fraction (P < 0.01). During follow-up, 244 patients (68.2%) experienced an adverse outcome (death, urgent transplantation, implantation of mechanical circulatory support). In patients with HF and CKD, the Cox proportional hazard model identified BNP, GDF-15, sex, systolic blood pressure, sodium, total cholesterol, and ACEi/ARB treatment as significant variables associated with an adverse outcome (P < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, BNP was replaced by GDF-15. Net reclassification improvement confirmed prognostic superiority of the model encompassing GDF-15 (GDF-15, sodium, total cholesterol, ACEi/ARB treatment) compared with the model without GDF-15 (BNP, sex, sodium, ACEi/ARB treatment), net reclassification improvement 0.62, P = 0.005. In contrast, in patients with HF and normal kidney function, BNP remained superior to GDF-15 in a multivariable model.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with systolic HF and CKD, GDF-15 is more strongly associated with adverse outcomes than the conventionally used BNP.
METHODS: A total of 358 patients with stable systolic HF were followed for a median of 1121 (interquartile range, 379-2600) days. Comprehensive evaluation including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and GDF-15 testing was performed at study entry; the analysis was stratified according to kidney function.
RESULTS: Patients with CKD (33.8%) were older, had more often diabetes, and were less often treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). GDF-15 was associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate, whereas BNP was associated with left ventricular-end diastolic diameter and ejection fraction (P < 0.01). During follow-up, 244 patients (68.2%) experienced an adverse outcome (death, urgent transplantation, implantation of mechanical circulatory support). In patients with HF and CKD, the Cox proportional hazard model identified BNP, GDF-15, sex, systolic blood pressure, sodium, total cholesterol, and ACEi/ARB treatment as significant variables associated with an adverse outcome (P < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, BNP was replaced by GDF-15. Net reclassification improvement confirmed prognostic superiority of the model encompassing GDF-15 (GDF-15, sodium, total cholesterol, ACEi/ARB treatment) compared with the model without GDF-15 (BNP, sex, sodium, ACEi/ARB treatment), net reclassification improvement 0.62, P = 0.005. In contrast, in patients with HF and normal kidney function, BNP remained superior to GDF-15 in a multivariable model.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with systolic HF and CKD, GDF-15 is more strongly associated with adverse outcomes than the conventionally used BNP.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Angiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBiomarkersBlood PressureCholesterolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateGrowth Differentiation Factor 15Heart Failure, SystolicHeart TransplantationHeart-Assist DevicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainProportional Hazards ModelsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSex FactorsSodiumSystole