MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00404-010-1368-6

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2010

Evaluation of the contraceptive efficacy, compliance, and satisfaction with the transdermal contraceptive patch system Evra: a comparison between adolescent and adult users.

Bodner Klaus, Bodner-Adler Barbara, Grünberger Werner

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Aim of the study was to evaluate Evra use in adolescents and compare the outcome with adult users.

METHODS

A total of 80 adolescents and 178 adults were followed-up at 1-, 3-, and 6-month interval with their compliance, satisfaction, cycle control, and adverse events being assessed.

RESULTS

Compliance rate was generally higher among adult users (p < 0.05). Partial and complete patch detachment were both significantly higher among adolescents (p < 0.05). Self-reported side effects did not differ between both groups and declined over the time. Overall satisfaction was high among most subjects. Compared with previous contraception, most subjects reported better satisfaction with Evra (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This investigation observed an overall positive impression of Evra with good compliance among adolescent and adult users. This might be an effect of the convenience of the weekly dosing schedule. Compliance is of utmost importance in teenagers as this age group is at highest risk of unintended pregnancy.

Для цитирования: Bodner Klaus, Bodner-Adler Barbara, Grünberger Werner. Evaluation of the contraceptive efficacy, compliance, and satisfaction with the transdermal contraceptive patch system Evra: a comparison between adolescent and adult users.. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1368-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.