Transplantation · 2002
Enzyme release from injured, preserved, and ex vivo reperfused liver does not indicate malfunction.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gioli-Pereira Luciana, Coradin Karin, Nagaoka Marcia R, Borges Durval Rosa, Kouyoumdjian Maria
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We compared the enzyme release from preserved and ex vivo reperfused livers after acute injury or inflammatory stimulus with organ function.
METHODS: Acute injury was induced by carbon tetrachloride and inflammation was induced by turpentine oil treatments. Livers were exsanguinated and preserved for 8 or 24 hr. Enzymes were measured in preservation and reperfusion solutions, and reperfused liver function was evaluated by O(2) consumption and bromsulphalein clearance.
RESULTS: The release of lysosomal enzymes was negligible in the preservation solution, and that of alanine aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase was similar in all groups. Release of aspartate aminotransferase and of EC 3.4.24.15 was more than that of the controls. During reperfusion liver function was normal in the injured group.
CONCLUSION: Release of enzymes, mainly aspartate aminotransferase and EC 3.4.24.15, into the preservation solution is a sensitive and early indicator of either inflammatory or acute injury alterations of the preserved liver, but does not reflect organ malfunction.
METHODS: Acute injury was induced by carbon tetrachloride and inflammation was induced by turpentine oil treatments. Livers were exsanguinated and preserved for 8 or 24 hr. Enzymes were measured in preservation and reperfusion solutions, and reperfused liver function was evaluated by O(2) consumption and bromsulphalein clearance.
RESULTS: The release of lysosomal enzymes was negligible in the preservation solution, and that of alanine aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase was similar in all groups. Release of aspartate aminotransferase and of EC 3.4.24.15 was more than that of the controls. During reperfusion liver function was normal in the injured group.
CONCLUSION: Release of enzymes, mainly aspartate aminotransferase and EC 3.4.24.15, into the preservation solution is a sensitive and early indicator of either inflammatory or acute injury alterations of the preserved liver, but does not reflect organ malfunction.