European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2001
A high rate of epidural analgesia with bupivacaine-sufentanil is consistent with a low rate of caesarean section and instrumental deliveries.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lindeberg S N, Thorén T, Hanson U
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate if a high rate of epidural analgesia (EDA) with bupivacaine-sufentanil is consistent with a low rate of caesarean section, instrumental deliveries and dystocia and to evaluate maternal and fetal adverse effects of sufentanil.
STUDY DESIGN: Populations-based prospective descriptive study. A change of EDA from bupivacaine to low dose bupivacaine-sufentanil at the delivery unit of the hospital during 1993 resulted in a marked increase in the rate of EDA. The outcome from the study period (1994-1995) was compared to the outcome during a reference period 1991-1992.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of caesarean section and instrumental delivery for dystocia between the two periods (4.4 and 4.6%). The overall incidence of caesarean section, 9.6% and instrumental deliveries, 6.4% during the study period was lower than or comparable to the national background data (11.1 and 6.8%, respectively) while the EDA rate was markedly higher 37.8 versus 21.9%.
CONCLUSION: A high rate of EDA, using low dose bupivacaine and sufentanil is consistent with a low rate of caesarean section and instrumental deliveries. No apparent negative effects on the neonates or mothers were observed.
STUDY DESIGN: Populations-based prospective descriptive study. A change of EDA from bupivacaine to low dose bupivacaine-sufentanil at the delivery unit of the hospital during 1993 resulted in a marked increase in the rate of EDA. The outcome from the study period (1994-1995) was compared to the outcome during a reference period 1991-1992.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of caesarean section and instrumental delivery for dystocia between the two periods (4.4 and 4.6%). The overall incidence of caesarean section, 9.6% and instrumental deliveries, 6.4% during the study period was lower than or comparable to the national background data (11.1 and 6.8%, respectively) while the EDA rate was markedly higher 37.8 versus 21.9%.
CONCLUSION: A high rate of EDA, using low dose bupivacaine and sufentanil is consistent with a low rate of caesarean section and instrumental deliveries. No apparent negative effects on the neonates or mothers were observed.