International journal of cardiology · 2019
Exercise and pharmacologic stress-induced interlead T-wave heterogeneity analysis to detect clinically significant coronary artery stenosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Silva Anderson C, de Antonio Victor Z, Sroubek Jakub, Gervino Ernest, Ho Kalon, Medeiros Sofia A, Silva Fernanda Tessarolo, Pedreira Giovanna C, Stocco Fernando G, Nearing Bruce D, Verrier Richard L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread use of ETT and vasodilator-stress with myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for noninvasive detection of flow-limiting coronary artery disease, there is continued need to improve diagnostic accuracy. We examined whether measurement of interlead T-wave heterogeneity (TWH) during exercise tolerance testing (ETT) or pharmacologic stress testing improves detection of stenoses in large epicardial coronary arteries.
METHODS: All 137 patients at our institution who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography within 0 to 5 days after ETT (N = 81) or dipyridamole IV infusion (N = 58) in 2016 were studied, including 2 patients with both tests. Cases (N = 93) had angiographically significant stenosis (≥50% of left main or ≥ 70% of an epicardial coronary artery ≥2 mm in diameter); controls (N = 44) did not. TWH, i.e., interlead splay of T waves, was determined by second central moment analysis from precordial leads by an investigator blinded to angiographic results.
RESULTS: At rest, TWH levels were similar for cases and controls. ETT and dipyridamole stress testing increased TWH by 69% (p < 0.0001) and 27% (p < 0.0001), respectively, in cases. In controls, TWH did not change. Areas under the ROC curves for TWH increase for any flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis were 0.737 (p < 0.0001) for ETT and 0.818 (p < 0.0001) for dipyridamole stress testing. By contrast, neither ST-segment changes during ETT (p = 0.12) nor MPI during dipyridamole stress testing (p = 0.60) discriminated cases from controls.
CONCLUSIONS: TWH measurement is a novel method that improves detection of angiographically confirmed flow-limiting stenoses in large epicardial coronary arteries during both ETT and MPI during pharmacologic stress testing with dipyridamole.
METHODS: All 137 patients at our institution who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography within 0 to 5 days after ETT (N = 81) or dipyridamole IV infusion (N = 58) in 2016 were studied, including 2 patients with both tests. Cases (N = 93) had angiographically significant stenosis (≥50% of left main or ≥ 70% of an epicardial coronary artery ≥2 mm in diameter); controls (N = 44) did not. TWH, i.e., interlead splay of T waves, was determined by second central moment analysis from precordial leads by an investigator blinded to angiographic results.
RESULTS: At rest, TWH levels were similar for cases and controls. ETT and dipyridamole stress testing increased TWH by 69% (p < 0.0001) and 27% (p < 0.0001), respectively, in cases. In controls, TWH did not change. Areas under the ROC curves for TWH increase for any flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis were 0.737 (p < 0.0001) for ETT and 0.818 (p < 0.0001) for dipyridamole stress testing. By contrast, neither ST-segment changes during ETT (p = 0.12) nor MPI during dipyridamole stress testing (p = 0.60) discriminated cases from controls.
CONCLUSIONS: TWH measurement is a novel method that improves detection of angiographically confirmed flow-limiting stenoses in large epicardial coronary arteries during both ETT and MPI during pharmacologic stress testing with dipyridamole.