Misinformation, thin-ideal internalization, and resistance to treatment: an interpretive phenomenological analysis of the experience of orthorexia nervosa.

PURPOSE: Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is an emerging pattern of disordered eating which may be driven by a pathological desire to consume only highly nutritious foods, absent concern over body weight, as is noted in anorexia nervosa (AN). This study seeks to clarify the development and progression of ON and add to researchers' understanding of this potential disorder.

METHOD: Utilizing Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis to guide data collection and analysis, interviews were conducted with 18 individuals who self-identified as having ON.

RESULTS: Participants described a clear distinction between orthorexia nervosa and clinically recognized eating disorders, with which they had prior experience. In addition, they demonstrated patterns of inflexible thinking that guided their perceptions of themselves and others. As a result, participants rapidly integrated newly acquired nutritional information, which led to escalations in restriction, social isolation, and physical symptoms of malnutrition. While prior findings on the relationship between ON and weight are conflicting, previously proposed criteria for ON emphasize an absence of weight-related concerns. The results of the present study suggest that weight control is a primary motivating factor in the escalating pattern of restriction.

CONCLUSION: The nuanced results from this work evidence the value of interpretive qualitative approaches to improve understanding of ON. In particular, participants' described inflexible thinking with respect to eating behaviors may help inform or revise screening instruments and provide important insights for treatment of ON.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, qualitative descriptive research.