Neurourology and urodynamics · 2003
Validation of the clinical bulbocavernosus reflex.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wester C, FitzGerald M P, Brubaker L, Welgoss J, Benson J T
Аннотация
AIMS: To validate the clinically obtained bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) by comparing it to the results of clitoroanal reflex (CAR) electrodiagnostic testing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty three women with detrusor overactivity underwent clinical examination and electrodiagnostic testing including evaluation of CAR latency using a Nicolet Viking IIe electrodiagnostic instrument, stimulating the paraclitoral area on each side in turn with paired stimuli while recording anal sphincter compound muscle action potentials bilaterally using surface patch electrodes. The results of clinical and electrodiagnostic testing were compared.
RESULTS: The BCR was clinically present on at least one side in 26 (79%) women, and thought to be clinically bilaterally absent in 7 (21%). Electrophysiologic testing revealed CARs to be at least unilaterally present in 30 (91%) patients. When the BCR was clinically present, a CAR was recorded in 92% of patients. Of the seven women with clinically absent BCR, just one had absent CARs.
CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of women with detrusor overactivity, the clinical BCR did not have strong correlation with the electrically obtained reflex.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty three women with detrusor overactivity underwent clinical examination and electrodiagnostic testing including evaluation of CAR latency using a Nicolet Viking IIe electrodiagnostic instrument, stimulating the paraclitoral area on each side in turn with paired stimuli while recording anal sphincter compound muscle action potentials bilaterally using surface patch electrodes. The results of clinical and electrodiagnostic testing were compared.
RESULTS: The BCR was clinically present on at least one side in 26 (79%) women, and thought to be clinically bilaterally absent in 7 (21%). Electrophysiologic testing revealed CARs to be at least unilaterally present in 30 (91%) patients. When the BCR was clinically present, a CAR was recorded in 92% of patients. Of the seven women with clinically absent BCR, just one had absent CARs.
CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of women with detrusor overactivity, the clinical BCR did not have strong correlation with the electrically obtained reflex.