International urogynecology journal · 2022
Brazilian version of the King's Health Questionnaire: assessment of the structural validity and internal consistency in female urinary incontinence.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brusaca Luiz Augusto, Rocha Ana Paula Rodrigues, Cardozo Linda, Oliveira Ana Beatriz, Driusso Patricia
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of valid patient-reported outcome measurements is essential in clinical and research settings. The structure of the Brazilian version of the King's Health Questionnaire (Br-KHQ) has not been evaluated. Thus, this study sought to evaluate the structural validity and internal consistency of the multi-item domains of the Br-KHQ in women with urinary incontinence (UI).
METHODS: A total of 462 Brazilian Portuguese speakers with UI aged 18 years or older were included in this study. Participants answered the Br-KHQ, and a questionnaire containing demographic and personal information. The structure of the Br-KHQ was examined through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with the implementation of parallel analysis and evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For the latter, several goodness-of-fit indices were considered to evaluate the model fit of the structures tested in this study. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, composite reliability, and coefficient omega.
RESULTS: The EFA showed that the questionnaire has a five-factor structure, i.e., limitations of daily life, personal relationship, emotions, sleep/energy, and severity measures. The CFA demonstrated that this structure presented the most adequate goodness-of-fit indices and the lowest values of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion, compared with the original and Portuguese structure. High values (>0.70) of internal consistency were found.
CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian version of the KHQ is composed of a five-factor structure. Further studies should evaluate other measurement properties of the Br-KHQ to ensure reliable interpretation of this patient-reported outcome measure in clinical practice.
METHODS: A total of 462 Brazilian Portuguese speakers with UI aged 18 years or older were included in this study. Participants answered the Br-KHQ, and a questionnaire containing demographic and personal information. The structure of the Br-KHQ was examined through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with the implementation of parallel analysis and evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For the latter, several goodness-of-fit indices were considered to evaluate the model fit of the structures tested in this study. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, composite reliability, and coefficient omega.
RESULTS: The EFA showed that the questionnaire has a five-factor structure, i.e., limitations of daily life, personal relationship, emotions, sleep/energy, and severity measures. The CFA demonstrated that this structure presented the most adequate goodness-of-fit indices and the lowest values of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion, compared with the original and Portuguese structure. High values (>0.70) of internal consistency were found.
CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian version of the KHQ is composed of a five-factor structure. Further studies should evaluate other measurement properties of the Br-KHQ to ensure reliable interpretation of this patient-reported outcome measure in clinical practice.