American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2019
Clinical Outcomes at 2 Years Between Beta-Blockade with ACE Inhibitors or ARBs in Patients with AMI Who Underwent Successful PCI with DES: A Retrospective Analysis of 23,978 Patients in the Korea AMI Registry.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Yong Hoon, Her Ae-Young, Jeong Myung Ho, Kim Byeong-Keuk, Hong Sung-Jin, Shin Dong-Ho, Kim Jung-Sun, Ko Young-Guk, Choi Donghoon, Hong Myeong-Ki, Jang Yangsoo
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Data concerning the clinical impact of combination therapy with β-blockers (BBs) + angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) compared with BBs + angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) are limited.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical outcomes at 2 years between these two combination therapies.
METHODS: We enrolled 23,978 patients with AMI who underwent successful PCI with DES between January 2005 and June 2015 from the Korea AMI Registry (KAMIR) and divided them into the two groups: BB + ACEI (n = 17,310) and BB + ARB (n = 6668). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-TVR. The secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidences of individual components of MACE and target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of death related to the target vessel, re-MI, or clinically driven TVR.
RESULTS: The relative risk of MACE was higher in the BB + ARB group than in the BB + ACEI group after propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.204; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.057-1.370; p = 0.005). The relative risks of all-cause death (HR 1.435 [95% CI 1.117-1.845]; p = 0.005), cardiac death (HR 1.733 [95% CI 1.253-2.396]; p = 0.001), TVR (HR 1.437 [95% CI 1.157-1.784]; p = 0.001), and TVF (HR 1.231 [95% CI 1.065-1.424]; p = 0.005) were also higher in the BB + ARB group after PSM.
CONCLUSIONS: The BB + ACEI group demonstrated reduced cumulative incidences of MACE, all-cause death, cardiac death, TVR, and TVF compared with the BB + ARB group in patients with AMI who underwent successful PCI with DES during a 2-year follow-up period.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical outcomes at 2 years between these two combination therapies.
METHODS: We enrolled 23,978 patients with AMI who underwent successful PCI with DES between January 2005 and June 2015 from the Korea AMI Registry (KAMIR) and divided them into the two groups: BB + ACEI (n = 17,310) and BB + ARB (n = 6668). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-TVR. The secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidences of individual components of MACE and target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of death related to the target vessel, re-MI, or clinically driven TVR.
RESULTS: The relative risk of MACE was higher in the BB + ARB group than in the BB + ACEI group after propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.204; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.057-1.370; p = 0.005). The relative risks of all-cause death (HR 1.435 [95% CI 1.117-1.845]; p = 0.005), cardiac death (HR 1.733 [95% CI 1.253-2.396]; p = 0.001), TVR (HR 1.437 [95% CI 1.157-1.784]; p = 0.001), and TVF (HR 1.231 [95% CI 1.065-1.424]; p = 0.005) were also higher in the BB + ARB group after PSM.
CONCLUSIONS: The BB + ACEI group demonstrated reduced cumulative incidences of MACE, all-cause death, cardiac death, TVR, and TVF compared with the BB + ARB group in patients with AMI who underwent successful PCI with DES during a 2-year follow-up period.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCause of DeathDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome