The clinical respiratory journal · 2016
Outcome of pleurodesis using different agents in management prolonged air leakage following lung resection.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jabłoński Sławomir, Kordiak Jacek, Wcisło Szymon, Terlecki Artur, Misiak Piotr, Santorek-Strumiłło Edyta, Lazarek Jerry, Kozakiewicz Marcin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prolonged air leaks (PAL) are a common problem after pulmonary resection. PAL can be a source of significant complications. One of the treatment options is chemical pleurodesis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The efficiency of three methods of treatment of PAL after lung resection was evaluated. In Iodine_ group aqueous iodine solution (lat.Tinctura Jodi) was applied intrapleurally (30 patients); in Doxycycline_group (34 patients) 200 mg of Doxycyclin was given and in Drainage_group 35 patients were applied Lidocaine solution only.
RESULTS: The group investigated was similar with regard to age [F = 0.04, P = 0.96] and the amount of air leakage (approx. 462 mL/min). The shortest drainage time and hospital stay was observed in the Iodine_group [10.57, P < 0.001]. However, this therapy was connected with strongly perceptible chest pain (P < 0.0001]). The number of case of pneumothorax recurrence was low and it was the same was seen in other methods of treatment [F = 0.87, P = 0.42]. Allergic reactions were not observed. The number of episodes of tachycardia, hypotension, dyspnea, pneumonia, subcutaneus empyema, fluid collection, emphysema, pneumothorax recurrence and number of re-thoracotomies were statistically similar in all three methods of treatment.
CONCLUSION: Iodine pleurodesis can be considered as one of possible treatment methods of PAL after lung resection as it showed favorable results compared with Doxycycline pleurodesis or drainage alone regarding duration of air leakage, hospitalization and pneumothorax recurrence with only slightly increased pleural pain.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The efficiency of three methods of treatment of PAL after lung resection was evaluated. In Iodine_ group aqueous iodine solution (lat.Tinctura Jodi) was applied intrapleurally (30 patients); in Doxycycline_group (34 patients) 200 mg of Doxycyclin was given and in Drainage_group 35 patients were applied Lidocaine solution only.
RESULTS: The group investigated was similar with regard to age [F = 0.04, P = 0.96] and the amount of air leakage (approx. 462 mL/min). The shortest drainage time and hospital stay was observed in the Iodine_group [10.57, P < 0.001]. However, this therapy was connected with strongly perceptible chest pain (P < 0.0001]). The number of case of pneumothorax recurrence was low and it was the same was seen in other methods of treatment [F = 0.87, P = 0.42]. Allergic reactions were not observed. The number of episodes of tachycardia, hypotension, dyspnea, pneumonia, subcutaneus empyema, fluid collection, emphysema, pneumothorax recurrence and number of re-thoracotomies were statistically similar in all three methods of treatment.
CONCLUSION: Iodine pleurodesis can be considered as one of possible treatment methods of PAL after lung resection as it showed favorable results compared with Doxycycline pleurodesis or drainage alone regarding duration of air leakage, hospitalization and pneumothorax recurrence with only slightly increased pleural pain.