European urology · 2000
Local anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a double-blind, prospective, randomized study.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Türker A K, Ozgen S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of local anesthesia in decreasing intravenous analgesic requirements during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with a second-generation lithotriptor was studied.
METHODS: Subcutaneous infiltration was performed before the procedure. Sixty-nine patients (ASA I-II) were randomly allocated into four groups. Lidocaine 1% plus epinephrine (5 microg/ml) were infiltrated subcutaneously in a group of patients with ureteral stones (group UL), and a group with renal stones (group RL). The same amount of saline was administered to a group of patients with ureteral stones (group UC), and a group with renal stones (group RC).
RESULTS: Patients with ureteral stones needed higher doses of intravenous analgesic. Neither patients with renal stones nor patients with ureteral stones administered local anesthetic required less intravenous analgesic than patients given placebo.
CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia did not decrease the requirement of intravenous doses of analgesics in patients treated with a second-generation lithotriptor (Dornier MPL 9000).
METHODS: Subcutaneous infiltration was performed before the procedure. Sixty-nine patients (ASA I-II) were randomly allocated into four groups. Lidocaine 1% plus epinephrine (5 microg/ml) were infiltrated subcutaneously in a group of patients with ureteral stones (group UL), and a group with renal stones (group RL). The same amount of saline was administered to a group of patients with ureteral stones (group UC), and a group with renal stones (group RC).
RESULTS: Patients with ureteral stones needed higher doses of intravenous analgesic. Neither patients with renal stones nor patients with ureteral stones administered local anesthetic required less intravenous analgesic than patients given placebo.
CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia did not decrease the requirement of intravenous doses of analgesics in patients treated with a second-generation lithotriptor (Dornier MPL 9000).