MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4037/ccn2012296

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care nurse · 2012

National survey of central venous catheter flushing in the intensive care unit.

Sona Carrie, Prentice Donna, Schallom Lynn

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Evidence is needed on the best solution for flushing central venous catheters.

OBJECTIVE

To understand current flushing practices for short-term central venous catheters among critical care nurses before implementation of a randomized, controlled trial comparing physiological saline with heparin solution for flushing to maintain catheter patency.

METHODS

A 6-item survey including demographic data was mailed to 2000 practicing critical care nurses in the United States. An additional 316 surveys were completed at the annual conference of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

RESULTS

Most (71.5%) of the 632 respondents who completed the survey were staff nurses. Most respondents (64.6%; 95% CI, 60.86%-68.34%) reported using physiological saline exclusively to flush central venous catheters and maintain patency. For heparin-containing solutions, the concentration and volume used varied. The most commonly reported volumes for flushing were 10 mL for saline (63%; 95% CI, 59.18%-66.82%) and 3 mL for heparin (50.2%; 95% CI, 43.5%-56.9%).

CONCLUSION

Flushing practices for central venous catheters vary widely. A randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the optimal flushing solution to maintain short-term patency.

Для цитирования: Sona Carrie, Prentice Donna, Schallom Lynn. National survey of central venous catheter flushing in the intensive care unit.. Critical care nurse. 2012. DOI: 10.4037/ccn2012296.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.