International urogynecology journal · 2022
CO2 Laser and radiofrequency compared to a sham control group in treatment of stress urinary incontinence (LARF study arm 3). A randomized controlled trial.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Seki Ana Silvia, Bianchi-Ferraro Ana Maria H M, Fonseca Eliana S M, Sartori Marair G F, Girão Manoel J B C, Jarmy-Di Bella Zsuzsanna I K
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a prevalent condition, and conservative treatment options are needed. Were evaluated CO2 laser and radiofrequency as treatment for SUI.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine women with SUI were eligible and randomized in a three-arm double-blind randomized controlled trial into radiofrequency (RF), laser (LS) and sham control (SCT) groups, with 3-monthly outpatient treatment sessions. One hundred fourteen women were included, 38 in each group, during a 12-month follow-up. The primary outcomes were: subjective improvement of SUI, evaluated on a Likert scale, and objective cure, which was a composite outcome defined according to negative stress tests, voiding diary and pad test. Questionnaires were also applied. The sample size was calculated to provide 80% power to identify a 20% difference between groups, p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Subjective improvement and objective cure of SUI were identified respectively in 72.6% and 45.2% in LS and in 61.7% and 44.7% in RF, both significantly higher than the 30.0% and 14.0% in SCT. Considering only mild cases (pad test < 10 g), objective cure was achieved in 66.7% in LS, 63.6% in RF and 22.2% in SCT. Significant reduction in the number of episodes of urinary incontinence was found according to voiding diaries (p = 0.029) and pad weight (p = 0.021). A significant reduction in urgency and urinary loss during sexual intercourse was observed only with LS and RF. Improvement in quality of life was also verified by the I-QoL and ICIQ-SF in favor of the energy-treated groups.
CONCLUSIONS: CO2 laser and radiofrequency are outpatient options for SUI treatment, with no major complications. They had similar results and presented better results than in the sham control group.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine women with SUI were eligible and randomized in a three-arm double-blind randomized controlled trial into radiofrequency (RF), laser (LS) and sham control (SCT) groups, with 3-monthly outpatient treatment sessions. One hundred fourteen women were included, 38 in each group, during a 12-month follow-up. The primary outcomes were: subjective improvement of SUI, evaluated on a Likert scale, and objective cure, which was a composite outcome defined according to negative stress tests, voiding diary and pad test. Questionnaires were also applied. The sample size was calculated to provide 80% power to identify a 20% difference between groups, p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Subjective improvement and objective cure of SUI were identified respectively in 72.6% and 45.2% in LS and in 61.7% and 44.7% in RF, both significantly higher than the 30.0% and 14.0% in SCT. Considering only mild cases (pad test < 10 g), objective cure was achieved in 66.7% in LS, 63.6% in RF and 22.2% in SCT. Significant reduction in the number of episodes of urinary incontinence was found according to voiding diaries (p = 0.029) and pad weight (p = 0.021). A significant reduction in urgency and urinary loss during sexual intercourse was observed only with LS and RF. Improvement in quality of life was also verified by the I-QoL and ICIQ-SF in favor of the energy-treated groups.
CONCLUSIONS: CO2 laser and radiofrequency are outpatient options for SUI treatment, with no major complications. They had similar results and presented better results than in the sham control group.