Annals of palliative medicine · 2022
Systematic review and meta-analysis of evaluation of selective cesarean section in postpartum pelvic floor function recovery under perineal ultrasound.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Yu, Geng Xuna, Zhou Haixia, Wang Weijing, Liang Yu, Zhang Chunye, Wang Lufang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Different delivery modes can affect the early pelvic floor function of puerpera, but there are no reports on the systematic evaluation of the effects of selective cesarean section delivery (CSD) and vaginal delivery (VD) on the pelvic floor function of puerpera.
METHODS: We searched for clinical controlled studies on the evaluation of pelvic floor function and performance after CSD and VD, published between 1 January 2010 and 1 August 2021, in the databases of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of trials included in the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Working Manual (5.3). Meta-analysis of the extracted data from the eligible articles was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software. The heterogeneity was assessed by chi-square, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant among groups.
RESULTS: A total of 3,704 parturient women were included in 10 articles, including 1,072 cases in the CSD group and 2,632 cases in the VD group. Meta-analysis showed that pelvic floor muscle strength {mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: -12.51 (-17.10 to -7.91); Z=5.34; P<0.00001} and bladder neck strength decreases in the CSD group [standardized mean difference (SMD) (95% CI): 1.01 (0.73 to 1.29); Z=7.08; P<0.00001] were higher than those in the VD group. In addition, the maximum urine flow [MD (95% CI): -6.86 (-9.32 to -4.39); Z=5.46; P<0.00001], bladder angle [MD (95% CI): -3.82 (-4.54 to -3.11); Z=10.46; P<0.00001], stress urinary incontinence (SUI) rate [relative risk (RR) (95% CI): 0.56 (0.35 to 0.88); Z=2.52; P=0.01], and pelvic floor organ prolapse rate [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI): 0.29 (0.09 to 0.89); Z=2.17; P=0.03] were lower than VD group, and the differences were significant (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Selective CSD can reduce the injury of pelvic floor muscle during delivery to a certain extent, and reduce the incidence of SUI and pelvic floor organ prolapse in early puerpera; however, such impacts cannot be completely avoided.
METHODS: We searched for clinical controlled studies on the evaluation of pelvic floor function and performance after CSD and VD, published between 1 January 2010 and 1 August 2021, in the databases of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of trials included in the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Working Manual (5.3). Meta-analysis of the extracted data from the eligible articles was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software. The heterogeneity was assessed by chi-square, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant among groups.
RESULTS: A total of 3,704 parturient women were included in 10 articles, including 1,072 cases in the CSD group and 2,632 cases in the VD group. Meta-analysis showed that pelvic floor muscle strength {mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: -12.51 (-17.10 to -7.91); Z=5.34; P<0.00001} and bladder neck strength decreases in the CSD group [standardized mean difference (SMD) (95% CI): 1.01 (0.73 to 1.29); Z=7.08; P<0.00001] were higher than those in the VD group. In addition, the maximum urine flow [MD (95% CI): -6.86 (-9.32 to -4.39); Z=5.46; P<0.00001], bladder angle [MD (95% CI): -3.82 (-4.54 to -3.11); Z=10.46; P<0.00001], stress urinary incontinence (SUI) rate [relative risk (RR) (95% CI): 0.56 (0.35 to 0.88); Z=2.52; P=0.01], and pelvic floor organ prolapse rate [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI): 0.29 (0.09 to 0.89); Z=2.17; P=0.03] were lower than VD group, and the differences were significant (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Selective CSD can reduce the injury of pelvic floor muscle during delivery to a certain extent, and reduce the incidence of SUI and pelvic floor organ prolapse in early puerpera; however, such impacts cannot be completely avoided.